Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2000

Caffeine withdrawal increases cerebral blood flow velocity and alters quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) activity

Jones HE, Herning RI, Cadet JL, Griffiths RR

Psychopharmacology · 41 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
U.S. Public Health Service
Gobierno
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Gobierno
NIDA NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA03890); National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32-DA07209)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2000-01-10 · Psychopharmacology (Berl) · vol. 147 · número 4 · págs. 371–377
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
64 citas · más que el 84% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
23 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue · Migraine and Headache Studies
Palabras clave
caffeine withdrawal, cerebral blood flow velocity, quantitative EEG, middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, pulsatility index, theta power, concentration ability, headache
MeSH
anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery, humans, substance withdrawal syndrome, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, electroencephalography, double-blind method, affect, psychomotor performance, cerebrovascular circulation, adult, middle aged, female, male

4 autores

  • Hendrée E. Jones🇺🇸Johns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins Medicine
  • Ronald I. Herning🇺🇸National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Jean Lud Cadet🇺🇸National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Roland R. Griffiths🇺🇸Johns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins Medicine

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Rationale

Cessation of daily caffeine consumption produces a withdrawal syndrome comprised of subjective symptoms and functional impairment. Few controlled studies have examined the physiological effects of caffeine withdrawal.

Objective

The present study examined the effect of caffeine withdrawal on cerebral blood flow velocity and quantitative EEG.

Methods

Ten volunteers reporting moderate caffeine intake (mean 333 mg/day) participated in this double-blind study. Subjects completed several tests when maintaining their normal diet (baseline period) and during two 1-day periods during which they consumed caffeine-free diets and received capsules containing placebo (placebo test session) or caffeine (caffeine test session) in amounts equal to their baseline daily caffeine consumption. Blood flow velocity was determined for four arteries: right and left middle (MCA), and right and left anterior (ACA) cerebral arteries using pulsed transcranial Doppler sonography. EEG was recorded for 3 min from eight scalp sites while subjects sat, with eyes closed, in a sound-attenuated electronically shielded chamber. Subjective effects were assessed with questionnaires.

Results

Results showed an effect of the placebo (21-h withdrawal) condition compared to the caffeine condition. Placebo significantly increased the mean velocity, systolic velocity and diastolic velocity (cm/s) in all four cerebral arteries. In the MCA, the pulsatility index was significantly decreased following placebo. Placebo significantly increased EEG theta power. Placebo also produces subjective effect changes, including increases in heavy feelings in arms and legs and decreases in ability to concentrate. The caffeine and baseline conditions produced similar results on both the physiological and subjective measures.

Conclusion

Cessation of daily caffeine consumption produced changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and quantitative EEG. These changes may be related to classic caffeine withdrawal symptoms of headache, drowsiness and decreased alertness.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.