Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2002Financiación no declarada

Carpal tunnel syndrome pain treated with low-level laser and microamperes transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: A controlled study

Naeser MA, Hahn KA, Lieberman BE, Branco KF

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 94 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2002-07-01 · Arch Phys Med Rehabil · vol. 83 · número 7 · págs. 978–988
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
181 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 9.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Pain Management and Treatment
Palabras clave
carpal tunnel syndrome, low-level laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture points, sham treatment, analgesia, conservative treatment
MeSH
median nerve, humans, pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, pain measurement, electrodiagnosis, treatment outcome, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, phototherapy, cross-over studies, double-blind method, reaction time, light, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, laser therapy, pain management

4 autores

  • Margaret A. Naeser🇺🇸Boston University; VA Boston Healthcare System
  • Kyung-Ae K. Hahn🇺🇸Boston University; VA Boston Healthcare System
  • Barbara E. Lieberman🇺🇸Boston University; VA Boston Healthcare System
  • Kenneth J. Branco🇺🇸Boston University; VA Boston Healthcare System

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To investigate whether real or sham low-level laser therapy (LLLT) plus microamperes transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) applied to acupuncture points significantly reduces pain in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-control, crossover trial. Patients and staff administered outcome measures blinded.

Setting

Outpatient, university-affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.

Participants

Eleven mild to moderate CTS cases (nerve conduction study, clinical examination) who failed standard medical or surgical treatment for 3 to 30 months.

Intervention

Patients received real and sham treatment series (each for 3-4wk), in a randomized order. Real treatments used red-beam laser (continuous wave, 15mW, 632.8nm) on shallow acupuncture points on the affected hand, infrared laser (pulsed, 9.4W, 904nm) on deeper points on upper extremity and cervical paraspinal areas, and microamps TENS on the affected wrist. Devices were painless, noninvasive, and produced no sensation whether they were real or sham. The hand was treated behind a hanging black curtain without the patient knowing if devices were on (real) or off (sham).

Main outcome measures

McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) score, sensory and motor latencies, and Phalen and Tinel signs.

Results

Significant decreases in MPQ score, median nerve sensory latency, and Phalen and Tinel signs after the real treatment series but not after the sham treatment series. Patients could perform their previous work (computer typist, handyman) and were stable for 1 to 3 years.

Conclusions

This new, conservative treatment was effective in treating CTS pain; larger studies are recommended.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.