Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2002Alimentación controladaSolo mecanismos

Extra virgin olive oil phenols and markers of oxidation in Greek smokers: a randomized cross-over study

Moschandreas J, Vissers MN, Wiseman S, van Putte KP, Kafatos A

European journal of clinical nutrition · 30 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controladaSolo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Wageningen University and Research

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2002-09-24 · Eur J Clin Nutr · vol. 56 · número 10 · págs. 1024–1029
Editorial
Springer Nature
Citado
43 citas · más que el 85% de estudios similares · 2.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
24 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis · Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Palabras clave
extra virgin olive oil, olive oil phenols, smokers, oxidative stress biomarkers, lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, antioxidant capacity, malondialdehyde, lipid hydroperoxides, protein carbonyls, dietary intervention
MeSH
humans, malondialdehyde, phenols, plant oils, proteins, fasting, cross-over studies, single-blind method, smoking, oxidation-reduction, lipid peroxidation, dose-response relationship, drug, adult, greece, female, male, biomarkers, olive oil

5 autores

  • Joanna A. Moschandreas🇬🇷University of Crete
  • Maud N. Vissers🇳🇱Wageningen University & Research
  • S.A. Wiseman🇳🇱Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen
  • Karel P. A. M. van Putte🇳🇱Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen
  • Anthony Kafatos🇬🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Crete

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To examine the effect of a low phenol olive oil and high phenol olive oil on markers of oxidation and plasma susceptibility to oxidation in normolipaemic smokers.

Design

Randomized single-blind cross-over trial with two intervention periods.

Setting

The Medical School and University Hospital of the University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Subjects

Twenty-five healthy males and females completed the study.

Interventions

Each intervention was of three weeks duration and intervention periods were separated by a two week washout. Seventy grams of extra virgin olive oil was supplied to each subject per day in the intervention periods. The olive oils supplied differed in their phenol content by 18.6 mg/day. Two fasting venous blood samples were taken at the end of each intervention period.

Results

The markers of antioxidant capacity measured in fasting plasma samples (total plasma resistance to oxidation, concentrations of protein carbonyl as a marker of protein oxidation, malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxides as markers of lipid oxidation and the ferric reducing ability of plasma) did not differ significantly between the low and high phenol olive oil diets.

Conclusions

No effect of olive oil phenols on markers of oxidation in smokers was detected. It may be that the natural concentrations of phenols in olive oil are too low to produce an effect in the post-absorptive phase. Possible reasons for period effects and interactions between diet and administration period need attention to aid further cross-over trials of this kind.

Sponsorship

Unilever Research Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.