Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2003Alimentación controladaFinanciación no declarada

Whole-grain rye and wheat foods and markers of bowel health in overweight middle-aged men

McIntosh GH, Noakes M, Royle PJ, Foster PR

The American journal of clinical nutrition · 97 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controladaFinanciación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2003-04-01 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 77 · número 4 · págs. 967–974
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
166 citas · más que el 96% de estudios similares · 6.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
56 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Food composition and properties · Gut microbiota and health · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
whole grain rye, whole wheat, dietary fiber, bowel health, fecal output, postprandial insulin, postprandial blood glucose, enterolactone
MeSH
intestines, feces, humans, triticum, ammonia, butyrates, propionates, lignans, 4-butyrolactone, cresols, insulin, glucuronidase, blood glucose, diet, cross-over studies, defecation, hydrogen-ion concentration, food, dietary fiber, middle aged, male, biomarkers, secale

4 autores

  • Graeme H. McIntosh🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition
  • Manny Noakes🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition
  • Peter J. Royle🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition
  • Paul Foster🇦🇺Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Health Sciences and Nutrition

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Whole-grain cereal foods including rye have been identified as providing significant health benefits that do not occur when refined-cereal foods are ingested.

Objectives

Foods (90 g) containing whole-grain rye flour and whole-grain wheat flour were compared with low-fiber refined-cereal foods for their effects on markers of bowel health and the metabolic markers insulin and glucose.

Design

Three 4-wk interventions were undertaken in a randomized crossover design with 28 overweight men aged 40-65 y who had no history of bowel disease. Against a background intake of 14 g dietary fiber (DF), the men were fed low-fiber cereal grain foods providing 5 g DF for a total of 19 g DF/d. High-fiber wheat foods provided 18 g DF, and high-fiber rye foods provided 18 g DF, both giving a total of 32 g DF/d. Fecal samples (48-h) and fasting and postprandial blood samples were collected at the end of each period and assayed.

Results

Both high-fiber rye and wheat foods increased fecal output by 33-36% (P = 0.004) and reduced fecal beta-glucuronidase activity by 29% (P = 0.027). Postprandial plasma insulin was decreased by 46-49% (P = 0.0001) and postprandial plasma glucose by 16-19% (P = 0.0005). Rye foods were associated with significantly (P = 0.0001) increased plasma enterolactone (47% and 71%) and fecal butyrate (26% and 36%), relative to wheat and low-fiber options, respectively.

Conclusions

High-fiber rye and wheat food consumption improved several markers of bowel and metabolic health relative to that of low-fiber food. Fiber from rye appears more effective than that from wheat in overall improvement of biomarkers of bowel health.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.