Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of stage III decubitus ulcers: a prospective, observer-blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial
Lucas C, van Gemert MJ, de Haan RJ
Lasers in medical science · 40 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2003-05-01 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 18 · número 2 · págs. 72–77
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 82 citas · más que el 85% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 35 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management · Wound Healing and Treatments
- Palabras clave
- low-level laser therapy, pressure ulcers, wound healing, wound size reduction, adjuvant therapy
- MeSH
- humans, treatment outcome, radiotherapy, adjuvant, severity of illness index, prospective studies, single-blind method, wound healing, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, pressure ulcer, female, male, low-level light therapy
3 autores
- Cees Lucas🇳🇱Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
- Martin J. C. van Gemert🇳🇱Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; University of Amsterdam
- Rob J. de Haan🇳🇱Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam; University of Amsterdam
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been suggested as a promising treatment option for open wounds. In view of the absence of randomised studies with sufficiently large sample sizes, we assessed the efficacy of LLLT in the treatment of stage III decubitus ulcers. We performed a prospective, observer-blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of LLLT as adjuvant to standard decubitus care. A total of 86 patients were enrolled into the study. Treatment was the prevailing consensus decubitus treatment (n=47); one group (n=39) had LLLT in addition, five times a week over a period of 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the absolute (mm2) and relative (%) wound size reduction at 6 weeks compared to baseline. Secondary outcome measures were the number of patients developing a stage IV ulcer during the study period, and the median change in Norton scores at 6 weeks compared to baseline. Based on the intention-to-treat principle, using last-observation-carried-forward analyses, Mann-Whitney U tests showed that the differences between the two groups in terms of absolute improvement (p=0.23) and relative improvement (p=0.42) were not significant. Because the wound size areas were non-normally distributed, we also analysed the data after logarithmic transformation of the wound size measurements. No significant difference in log(e) improvement scores between groups could be demonstrated (unpaired t-test: p=0.59). During the treatment period 11% of the patients in the control group and 8% of the patients in the LLLT group developed a stage IV decubitus ulcer (Fisher's exact test: p=0.72). The patients' Norton scores did not change during the treatment period. In this trial we found no evidence that justifies using low-level laser therapy as an adjuvant to the consensus decubitus ulcer treatment.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.