Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2003Financiación no declaradaSolo mecanismos

Relationship between caffeine-induced changes in resting cerebral perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent signal

Laurienti PJ, Field AS, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, Yen YF, Moody DM

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 47 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declaradaSolo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2003-09-01 · AJNR Am J Neuroradiol · vol. 24 · número 8 · págs. 1607–11
Editorial
National Institutes of Health
Citado
75 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
37 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Palabras clave
caffeine, blood oxygenation level-dependent signal, adenosine receptor antagonists, theophylline, visual stimulation, auditory stimulation, functional MRI, cerebral blood flow
MeSH
cerebral cortex, visual cortex, auditory cortex, humans, caffeine, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, image enhancement, acoustic stimulation, single-blind method, photic stimulation, arousal, oxygen consumption, regional blood flow, reference values, coffee, image processing, computer-assisted, adult, female, male

6 autores

  • Paul J. Laurienti🇺🇸Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Wake Forest University
  • Aaron S. Field🇺🇸Wake Forest University
  • Jonathan H. Burdette🇺🇸Wake Forest University
  • Joseph A. Maldjian🇺🇸Wake Forest University
  • Yi‐Fen Yen🇺🇸Wake Forest University
  • Dixon M. Moody🇺🇸Wake Forest University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and purpose

Recent interest has emerged in the use of pharmacologic methods to maximize blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity changes in functional MR imaging (fMRI). Adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine and theophylline, have been identified as potential agents for this purpose. The present study was designed to determine whether caffeine-induced decreases in cerebral perfusion result in enhanced BOLD responses to visual and auditory stimuli.

Methods

MR imaging was used to measure resting cerebral perfusion and stimulus-induced BOLD signal intensity changes in 19 patients. We evaluated the relationship between resting cerebral perfusion and the magnitude of BOLD signal intensity induced by visual and auditory stimulation under caffeine and placebo conditions.

Results

The data showed that changes in resting cerebral perfusion produced by caffeine are not a consistent predictor of BOLD signal intensity magnitude. Although all cerebral perfusion was reduced in all study participants in response to caffeine, only 47% of the participants experienced BOLD signal intensity increase. This finding was independent of the participants' usual caffeine consumption.

Conclusion

The data presented herein show that the relationship between resting cerebral perfusion and the magnitude of BOLD signal intensity is complex. It is not possible to consistently enhance BOLD signal intensity magnitude by decreasing resting perfusion with caffeine. Future studies aimed at evaluating the relationship between perfusion and BOLD signal intensity changes should seek a means to selectively modulate known components of the neural and vascular responses independently.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.