Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2004

Clinical trial of docosahexaenoic acid in patients with retinitis pigmentosa receiving vitamin A treatment

Berson EL, Rosner B, Sandberg MA, Weigel-DiFranco C, Moser A, Brockhurst RJ, Hayes KC, Johnson CA, Anderson EJ, Gaudio AR, Willett WC, Schaefer EJ

Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 112 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Organización sin fines de lucro
Foundation Fighting Blindness
Universidad u hospital
Brandeis University
Gobierno
National Eye Institute
Gobierno
NEI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Eye Institute (U10 EY 11030)

Según 5 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2004-09-01 · Arch Ophthalmol · vol. 122 · número 9 · pág. 1297
Editorial
American Medical Association
Citado
175 citas · más que el 86% de estudios similares · 2.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
52 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Retinal Development and Disorders · Retinal Diseases and Treatments · Fatty Acid Research and Health
Palabras clave
docosahexaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, retinitis pigmentosa, vitamin A supplementation, retinyl palmitate, retinal degeneration, visual field sensitivity, electroretinogram, visual acuity, disease progression, dietary omega-3 fatty acids, safety and tolerability, long-term supplementation
MeSH
humans, vision disorders, retinitis pigmentosa, vitamin e, docosahexaenoic acids, electroretinography, drug therapy, combination, administration, oral, pilot projects, double-blind method, visual fields, adolescent, adult, middle aged, female, male

1 autor

  • Eliot L. Berson🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaHarvard University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To determine whether a therapeutic dose of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid, will slow the course of retinal degeneration in adult patients with retinitis pigmentosa who are also receiving vitamin A.

Design

Randomized, controlled, double-masked trial of 221 patients, aged 18 to 55 years, evaluated over a 4-year interval. Patients were given either 1200 mg/d of docosahexaenoic acid or control capsules. All were given 15 000 IU/d of vitamin A (given as retinyl palmitate). Randomization considered genetic type and baseline dietary omega-3 fatty acid intake.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was the total point score for the 30-2 program of the Humphrey field analyzer; secondary outcome measures were the total point score for the 30-2 and 30/60-1 programs combined, 30-Hz electroretinogram amplitude, and Early Treatment Diabetic Rentinopathy Study visual acuity.

Results

No significant differences in decline in ocular function were found between the docosahexaenoic acid plus vitamin A (DHA + A) group and control plus vitamin A (control + A) group over a 4-year interval among all 221 randomized patients or among the 208 patients who completed all 4 follow-up visits. The mean annual rate of loss of sensitivity for the Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 program was 37 dB for the DHA + A group and 38 dB for the control + A group (P =.88). For the Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 and 30/60-1 programs combined, the mean annual rates of loss of field sensitivity were 57 dB for the DHA + A group and 60 dB (P =.73) for control + A group. No toxic adverse effects were observed. No significant differences by treatment group assignment were observed within genetic types or within the category of baseline omega-3 fatty acid intake.

Conclusion

In patients assigned to receive 15 000 IU/d of vitamin A, this randomized trial showed that 1200 mg/d of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation over a 4-year interval did not, on average, slow the course of disease in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.