Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2005Financiación no declarada

Caffeine effects on resting-state arousal

Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Wallace MJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ, Zlojutro I

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 131 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2005-10-11 · Clin Neurophysiol · vol. 116 · número 11 · págs. 2693–2700
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
190 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
55 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Neural dynamics and brain function · Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Palabras clave
caffeine, arousal, skin conductance level, EEG alpha power, alpha frequency, autonomic arousal, cardiovascular effects, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperarousal, hypoarousal
MeSH
humans, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, electroencephalography, alpha rhythm, cross-over studies, double-blind method, arousal, galvanic skin response, rest, adult, female, male

6 autores

  • Robert J. Barry🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Wollongong
  • Jacqueline Ann Rushby🇦🇺University of Wollongong
  • Mark J. Wallace🇦🇺University of Wollongong
  • Adam R. Clarke🇦🇺University of Wollongong
  • Stuart John Johnstone🇦🇺University of Wollongong
  • I ZLOJUTRO🇦🇺University of Wollongong

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

This study examined the use of caffeine to manipulate arousal level without the confounds associated with task-related activation. From previous work in our laboratory, an increase in skin conductance level (SCL) and EEG alpha frequency, together with a global decrease in alpha power, were used as markers of arousal increase, and we sought to identify these effects with caffeine ingestion.

Methods

We examined the effect of a single oral dose of caffeine (250 mg) in a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled repeated-measures cross-over study. Eighteen healthy university students (mean age 21 years; 13/18 females) participated in two sessions 1 week apart. EEG and autonomic data (SCL, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and respiration rate) from a 2 min eyes-closed epoch, commencing approximately 30 min after ingestion of caffeine or placebo, were examined.

Results

Caffeine was associated with increased SCL, a global reduction in EEG power in the alpha band, and a global increase in alpha frequency. There were no cardiovascular effects.

Conclusions

The positive results are consistent with recent electrodermal and EEG studies of arousal and suggest that caffeine may be utilised as a task-free means of manipulating arousal in future investigations. Further work is necessary to clarify the absence of cardiovascular effects, and to integrate those data with emerging conceptualisations of arousal and activation.

Significance

The present data support the use of caffeine as a simple tool to explore the role of arousal in both normal and atypical functioning, and this may be useful in determining the validity and importance of supposed hyper- or hypo-arousal in such syndromes as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.