Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2005

Effects of repeated doses of caffeine on mood and performance of alert and fatigued volunteers

Smith A, Sutherland D, Christopher G

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 56 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Organización sin fines de lucro
British Association for Psychopharmacology

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2005-11-01 · J Psychopharmacol · vol. 19 · número 6 · págs. 620–626
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
121 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue · Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Palabras clave
caffeine, mood, cognitive performance, fatigue, alertness, arousal, caffeine withdrawal, dose-response relationship, noradrenergic system, cholinergic system
MeSH
humans, caffeine, drug administration schedule, double-blind method, mental fatigue, affect, pattern recognition, visual, psychomotor performance, arousal, attention, reaction time, dose-response relationship, drug, adolescent, adult, female, male

3 autores

  • Andrew Paul Smith🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaCardiff University
  • David Sutherland🇬🇧Cardiff University
  • Gary Christopher🇬🇧Cardiff University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Evidence for behavioural effects of caffeine is well documented in the literature. It is associated with increased subjective alertness, improved reaction time and enhanced encoding of new information. These effects are most prominent in low arousal situations. However, there is an ongoing debate as to whether such changes are in fact improvements or merely a reversal of the negative effects of a period of caffeine withdrawal (e.g. overnight abstinence). To avoid such a confound this study included multiple doses of caffeine which were administered under double-blind conditions to participants who had ingested their normal daily quota of caffeine. In the present study participants were fatigued by carrying out a prolonged testing schedule in the evening. Sixty volunteers, all regular caffeine consumers, took part in the study. They attended for three sessions on separate days. They were instructed to consume normal amounts of caffeinated beverages. Consumption was measured by a diary and saliva samples were taken and caffeine assays conducted. A baseline test session was carried out at 18.00h and following this a double blind placebo controlled caffeine challenge (1.5mg/kg) conducted. The test battery was repeated twice approximately 30 minutes after the caffeine challenge. Following this another drink was administered and the test battery repeated twice more. On one test session volunteers had placebo in both drinks, in another they had caffeine in both drinks and another caffeine in the first and placebo in the second. Order of conditions was balanced across subjects. The results showed that caffeine led to a more positive mood and improved performance on a number of tasks. Different effects of caffeine were seen depending on the person's level of arousal. Linear effects of caffeine dose were also observed. This is evidence against the argument that behavioural changes due to caffeine are merely the reversal of negative effects of a long period of caffeine abstinence. The findings are discussed in relation to both noradrenergic and cholinergic neurotransmitter systems.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.