Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo clínico controlado2006

Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf

Ford KR, Manson NA, Evans BJ, Myer GD, Gwin RC, Heidt RS, Hewett TE

Journal of science and medicine in sport · 61 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo clínico controlado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Hospital Research Foundation
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Gobierno
NIAMS NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R101-AR049735-01A1)

Según 4 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2006-05-05 · J Sci Med Sport · vol. 9 · número 6 · págs. 433–440
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
131 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.5× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
23 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Palabras clave
Foot (prosody), Natural (archaeology), Environmental science, Biology, Art
MeSH
foot, humans, poaceae, athletic injuries, friction, pressure, shoes, male, biomechanical phenomena

7 autores

  • Kevin Ray Ford🇺🇸🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Hospital Research Foundation
  • Neil A. Manson
  • Blake Evans🇺🇸Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Gregory D. Myer🇺🇸Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Richelle C. Gwin
  • Robert S. Heidt
  • Timothy Edwin Hewett🇺🇸Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Synthetic playing surfaces with rubber or sand infill are now used on many athletic fields such as soccer, football and rugby. Although these surfaces may come closer to the mechanical characteristics of a true grass playing surface than the older turf designs, their potential effects on lower extremity biomechanics and related injury rates necessitate further study. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two surfaces (natural grass versus turf) on in-shoe foot loading patterns during cutting. Seventeen male football players were tested on a slalom course. An in-shoe pressure distribution measurement insole was used in the right shoe (14 stud, molded cleat) of each athlete. Individual cutting steps were extracted from each slalom trial and peak pressure and relative load calculated in nine distinct plantar regions of the foot. The turf condition had significantly higher peak pressures within the central forefoot (turf: 646.6+/-172.6 kPa, grass: 533.3+/-143.4 kPa, P=0.017) and lesser toes (turf: 429.3+/-200.9 kPa, grass: 348.1+/-119.0 kPa, P=0.043) compared to grass. In contrast, the relative load within the medial forefoot (turf: 27.2+/-5.3%, grass: 30.2+/-6.6%, P=0.031) and lateral midfoot (turf: 3.4+/-1.8%, grass: 4.1+/-2.3%, P=0.029) were higher during the grass condition. No differences between the grass and turf were found in maximal effort sprint times performed prior to the testing trials. This study demonstrates that playing surface significantly affects plantar loading during sport related activities. Further epidemiological investigation is warranted to determine the effects of playing surfaces on sport specific injury mechanisms.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.