The influence of different playing surfaces on the biomechanics of a tennis running forehand foot plant
Stiles VH, Dixon SJ
Journal of applied biomechanics · 14 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaSolo mecanismosDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo clínico controlado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Solo mecanismos
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2006-02-01 · J Appl Biomech · vol. 22 · número 1 · págs. 14–24
- Editorial
- International Society of Biomechanics
- Citado
- 51 citas · más que el 85% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 32 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training
- Palabras clave
- Kinematics, Ground reaction force, Cushioning, Biomechanics, Foot (prosody), Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Sports biomechanics, Mathematics, Physical therapy, Simulation, Materials science, Medicine, Anatomy, Engineering, Physics, Composite material
- MeSH
- foot, humans, transducers, pressure, movement, running, friction, stress, mechanical, weight-bearing, pressure, tennis, video recording, adolescent, adult, female, biomechanical phenomena
2 autores
- Victoria H. Stiles🇬🇧University of Exeter
- Sharon Dixon🇬🇧University of Exeter
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Research suggests that heightened impacts, altered joint movement patterns, and changes in friction coefficient from the use of artificial surfaces in sport increase the prevalence of overuse injuries. The purposes of this study were to (a) develop procedures to assess a tennis-specific movement, (b) characterize the ground reaction force (GRF) impact phases of the movement, and (c) assess human response during impact with changes in common playing surfaces. In relation to the third purpose it was hypothesized that surfaces with greatest mechanical cushioning would yield lower impact forces (PkFz) and rates of loading. Six shod volunteers performed 8 running forehand trials on each surface condition: baseline, carpet, acrylic, and artificial turf. Force plate (960 Hz) and kinematic data (120 Hz) were collected simultaneously for each trial. Running forehand foot plants are typically characterized by 3 peaks in vertical GRF prior to a foot-off peak. Group mean PkFz was significantly lower and peak braking force was significantly higher on the baseline surface compared with the other three test surfaces (p<0.05). No significant changes in initial kinematics were found to explain unexpected PkFz results. The baseline surface yielded a significantly higher coefficient of friction compared with the other three test surfaces (p<0.05). While the hypothesis is rejected, biomechanical analysis has revealed changes in surface type with regard to GRF variables.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.