Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2006

Effects of oral magnesium supplementation on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials

Song Y, He K, Levitan EB, Manson JE, Liu S

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 171 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK066401)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2006-05-31 · Diabet Med · vol. 23 · número 10 · págs. 1050–1056
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
266 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 5.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
31 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Diabetes Treatment and Management · Trace Elements in Health
Palabras clave
magnesium supplementation, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, lipids, body mass index
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, hypoglycemia, magnesium, blood glucose, administration, oral, double-blind method, aged, middle aged, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic

5 autores

  • Yiqing Song🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Ka He🇺🇸Northwestern University
  • Emily B. Levitan🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • JoAnn E. Manson🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Simin Liu🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the evidence on the effect of oral magnesium supplementation on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We searched the electronic databases of medline, embase and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to January 2005. We identified nine randomized double-blind controlled trials with a total of 370 patients with Type 2 diabetes and of duration 4-16 weeks. The median dose of oral magnesium supplementation was 15 mmol/day (360 mg/day) in the treatment groups. The primary outcome was glycaemic control, as measured by glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) or fasting blood glucose levels; the secondary outcomes included body mass index, blood pressure (BP) and lipids. Using a random-effects model, we calculated the weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

After a median duration of 12 weeks, the weighted mean post-intervention fasting glucose was significantly lower in the treatment groups compared with the placebo groups [-0.56 mmol/l (95% CI, -1.10 to -0.01); P for heterogeneity = 0.02]. The difference in post-intervention HbA(1c) between magnesium supplementation groups and control groups was not significant [-0.31% (95% CI, -0.81 to 0.19); P for heterogeneity = 0.10]. Neither systolic nor diastolic BP was significantly changed. Magnesium supplementation increased on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels [0.08 mmol/l (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.14); P for heterogeneity = 0.36] but had no effect on total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride.

Conclusions

Oral magnesium supplementation for 4-16 weeks may be effective in reducing plasma fasting glucose levels and raising HDL cholesterol in patients with Type 2 diabetes, although the long-term benefits and safety of magnesium treatment on glycaemic control remain to be determined.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.