Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2006Financiación no declarada

Pain relief by single low-level laser irradiation in orthodontic patients undergoing fixed appliance therapy

Turhani D, Scheriau M, Kapral D, Benesch T, Jonke E, Bantleon HP

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 104 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2006-09-01 · Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop · vol. 130 · número 3 · págs. 371–377
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
196 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 2.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
34 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, orthodontic pain, fixed orthodontic appliances, pain perception, orthodontic complications, sex differences in pain
MeSH
humans, facial pain, pain measurement, linear models, chi-square distribution, single-blind method, orthodontic appliances, perception, sex factors, time factors, adolescent, adult, child, female, male, surveys and questionnaires, low-level light therapy, tooth movement techniques

6 autores

  • Dritan Turhani🇦🇹 · autor de correspondenciaMedical University of Vienna
  • M. Scheriau🇦🇹Medical University of Vienna
  • D. Kapral🇦🇹Medical University of Vienna
  • Thomas Benesch🇦🇹Medical University of Vienna
  • Erwin Jonke🇦🇹Medical University of Vienna
  • Hans Peter Bantleon🇦🇹Medical University of Vienna

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of single low-level laser therapy (LLLT) irradiation on pain perception in patients having fixed appliance treatment.

Methods

Seventy-six patients (46 women, 30 men; mean age, 23.1 years) enrolled in this single-blind study were assigned to 2 groups. The patients in group 1 (G1; 38 patients, 13 men, 25 women; mean age, 25.1 years) received a single course of LLLT (Mini Laser 2075, Helbo Photodynamic Systems GmbH & Co KG, Linz, Austria; wavelength 670 nm, power output 75 mW) for 30 seconds per banded tooth. The patients in group 2 (G2; 38 patients, 17 men, 21 women; mean age, 21.0 years) received placebo laser therapy without active laser irradiation. Pain perception was evaluated at 6, 30, and 54 hours after LLLT by self-rating with a standardized questionnaire.

Results

Major differences in pain perception were found between the 2 groups. The number of patients reporting pain at 6 hours was significantly lower in G1 (n = 14) than in G2 (n = 29) (P <.05), and the differences persisted at 30 hours (G1, n = 22; G2, n = 33) (P <.05). At 54 hours, no significant differences were seen between the number of patients reporting pain (G1, n = 20; G2, n = 25), although the women had a different prevalence between G1 (n = 11) and G2 (n = 15) (P = .079). At 6, 30, and 54 hours, more than 90% of the subjects in both groups described the pain as "tearing."

Conclusions

LLLT immediately after multibanding reduced the prevalence of pain perception at 6 and 30 hours. LLLT might have positive effects in orthodontic patients not only immediately after multibanding, but also for preventing pain during treatment.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.