Creatine supplementation, sleep deprivation, cortisol, melatonin and behavior
McMorris T, Harris RC, Howard AN, Langridge G, Hall B, Corbett J, Dicks M, Hodgson C
Physiology & behavior · 74 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2006-12-20 · Physiol Behav · vol. 90 · número 1 · págs. 21–28
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 115 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.6× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 54 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue · Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Palabras clave
- creatine supplementation, creatine monohydrate, sleep deprivation, cortisol, melatonin, mood states, effort, central executive function, short-term memory, psychomotor performance, balance, intermittent exercise, cognitive performance, salivary biomarkers
- MeSH
- saliva, humans, sleep deprivation, creatine, melatonin, hydrocortisone, exercise, analysis of variance, statistics, nonparametric, double-blind method, affect, cognition, memory, short-term, problem solving, psychomotor performance, attention, time factors, reference values, dietary supplements, adult, male
8 autores
- Terry McMorris🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Chichester
- Roger C. Harris🇬🇧University of Chichester
- Alan N Howard🇬🇧The Howard Foundation
- G. Langridge🇬🇧University of Chichester
- B. Hall🇬🇧University of Chichester
- Jo Corbett🇬🇧University of Portsmouth
- Matt Dicks🇬🇧University of Chichester
- C. Hodgson🇬🇧University of Chichester
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The effect of creatine supplementation and sleep deprivation, with intermittent moderate-intensity exercise, on cognitive and psychomotor performance, mood state, effort and salivary concentrations of cortisol and melatonin were examined. Subjects were divided into a creatine supplementation group and a placebo group. They took 5 g of creatine monohydrate or a placebo, dependent on their group, four times a day for 7 days immediately prior to the experiment. They undertook tests examining central executive functioning, short-term memory, choice reaction time, balance, mood state and effort at baseline and following 18-, 24- and 36-h sleep deprivation, with moderate intermittent exercise. Saliva samples were taken prior to each set of tests. A group x time analysis of covariance, with baseline performance the covariate, showed that the creatine group performed significantly (p < 0.05) better than the placebo group on the central executive task but only at 36 h. The creatine group demonstrated a significant (p < 0.01) linear improvement in performance of the central executive task throughout the experiment, while the placebo group showed no significant effects. There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the other variables. A significant (p < 0.001) main effect of time was found for the balance test with a linear improvement being registered. Cortisol concentrations on Day 1 were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than on Day 2. Mood significantly (p < 0.001) deteriorated up to 24 h with no change from 24 to 36 h. Effort at baseline was significantly (p < 0.01) lower than in the other conditions. It was concluded that, during sleep deprivation with moderate-intensity exercise, creatine supplementation only affects performance of complex central executive tasks.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.