Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2006Financiación no declarada

Placebo effects of caffeine on cycling performance

Beedie CJ, Stuart EM, Coleman DA, Foad AJ

Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 133 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2006-11-28 · Med Sci Sports Exerc · vol. 38 · número 12 · págs. 2159–2164
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
209 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 3.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
18 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Pain Management and Placebo Effect · Coffee research and impacts · Sports Performance and Training
Palabras clave
placebo effect, caffeine, cycling performance, dose-response relationship, well-trained cyclists
MeSH
humans, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, double-blind method, psychomotor performance, placebo effect, bicycling, adult, male

4 autores

  • Chris Beedie🇬🇧Canterbury Christ Church University
  • ELIZABETH M. STUART🇬🇧Canterbury Christ Church University
  • DAMIAN A. COLEMAN🇬🇧Canterbury Christ Church University
  • ABIGAIL J. FOAD🇬🇧Canterbury Christ Church University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

The placebo effect-a change attributable only to an individual's belief in the efficacy of a treatment-might provide a worthwhile improvement in physical performance. Although sports scientists account for placebo effects by blinding subjects to treatments, little research has sought to quantify and explain the effect itself. The present study explored the placebo effect in laboratory cycling performance using quantitative and qualitative methods.

Method

Six well-trained male cyclists undertook two baseline and three experimental 10-km time trials. Subjects were informed that in the experimental trials they would each receive a placebo, 4.5 mg.kg caffeine, and 9.0 mg.kg caffeine, randomly assigned. However, placebos were administered in all experimental conditions. Semistructured interviews were also conducted to explore subjects' experience of the effects of the capsules before and after revealing the deception.

Results

A likely trivial increase in mean power of 1.0% over baseline was associated with experimental trials (95% confidence limits, -1.4 to 3.6%), rising to a likely beneficial 2.2% increase in power associated with experimental trials in which subjects believed they had ingested caffeine (-0.8 to 5.4%). A dose-response relationship was evident in experimental trials, with subjects producing 1.4% less power than at baseline when they believed they had ingested a placebo (-4.6 to 1.9%), 1.3% more power than at baseline when they believed they had ingested 4.5 mg.kg caffeine (-1.4 to 4.1%), and 3.1% more power than at baseline when they believed they had ingested 9.0 mg.kg caffeine (-0.4 to 6.7%). All subjects reported caffeine-related symptoms.

Conclusions

Quantitative and qualitative data suggest that placebo effects are associated with the administration of caffeine and that these effects may directly or indirectly enhance performance in well-trained cyclists.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.