Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2007

Maternal consumption of a docosahexaenoic acid-containing functional food during pregnancy: benefit for infant performance on problem-solving but not on recognition memory tasks at age 9 mo

Judge MP, Harel O, Lammi-Keefe CJ

The American journal of clinical nutrition · 129 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institute of Mental Health
Gobierno
NIMH NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH087219)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2007-06-01 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 85 · número 6 · págs. 1572–1577
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
239 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 12.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
57 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Birth, Development, and Health
Palabras clave
docosahexaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, maternal supplementation, pregnancy, functional foods, infant cognitive development, cereal bars
MeSH
humans, prenatal exposure delayed effects, docosahexaenoic acids, double-blind method, problem solving, pregnancy, pregnancy trimester, second, pregnancy trimester, third, dietary supplements, adolescent, adult, infant, female, male, recognition, psychology

3 autores

  • Michelle Price Judge🇺🇸Pennington Biomedical Research Center; Louisiana State University; University of Connecticut
  • Ofer Harel🇺🇸Pennington Biomedical Research Center; Louisiana State University; University of Connecticut
  • Carol J. Lammi‐Keefe🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaPennington Biomedical Research Center; Louisiana State University; University of Connecticut

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

There are few studies reporting on docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) supplementation during pregnancy and infant cognitive function. DHA supplementation in pregnancy and infant problem solving in the first year have not been investigated.

Objective

We tested the hypothesis that infants born to women who consumed a DHA-containing functional food during pregnancy would demonstrate better problem-solving abilities and recognition memory than would infants born to women who consumed the placebo during pregnancy.

Design

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, pregnant women consumed a DHA-containing functional food or a placebo from gestation week 24 until delivery. Study groups received DHA-containing cereal-based bars (300 mg DHA/92-kcal bar; average consumption: 5 bars/wk; n = 14) or cereal-based placebo bars (n = 15). The Infant Planning Test and Fagan Test of Infant Intelligence were administered to infants at age 9 mo. The problem-solving trial included a support step and a search step. The procedure was scored on the basis of the infant's performance on each step and on the entire problem (intention score and total intentional solutions). Scores were generated on the basis of the cumulative performance of the infant on 5 trials.

Results

Treatment had significant effects on the performance of problem-solving tasks: total intention score (P = 0.017), total intentional solutions (P = 0.011), and number of intentional solutions on both cloth (P = 0.008) and cover (P = 0.004) steps. There were no significant differences between groups in any measure of Fagan Test of Infant Intelligence.

Conclusion

These data point to a benefit for problem solving but not for recognition memory at age 9 mo in infants of mothers who consumed a DHA-containing functional food during pregnancy.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.