Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2007Financiación no declarada

Effect of low level laser therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Ekim A, Armagan O, Tascioglu F, Oner C, Colak M

Swiss medical weekly · 39 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2007-06-16 · Swiss Med Wkly · vol. 137 · número 2324 · págs. 347–352
Citado
71 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
21 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (publicación gratuita) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, rheumatoid arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, analgesia, hand function, grip strength, Tinel's sign, electrophysiological assessment, Functional Status Scale
MeSH
humans, arthritis, rheumatoid, carpal tunnel syndrome, treatment outcome, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, low-level light therapy

2 autores

  • Ayşe Aydemir Ekim🇹🇷Eskişehir Osmangazi University
  • M Colak

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of low level laser therapy (LLLT) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Material and methods

a total of 19 patients with the diagnosis of CTS in 19 hands were included and randomly assigned to two treatment groups; LLLT (Group 1) (10 hands) with dosage 1.5 J/ per point and placebo laser therapy group (Group 2) (9 hands). A Galium-Aluminum-Arsenide diode laser device was used as a source of low power laser with a power output of 50 mW and wavelength of 780 nm. All treatments were applied once a day on week days for a total period of 10 days. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of the treatment and at month 3. Tinel and Phalen signs were tested in all patients. Patients were evaluated for such clinical parameters as functional status scale (FSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), symptom severity scale (SSS) and grip-strength. However, electrophysiological examination was performed on all hands. Results were given with descriptive statistics and confidence intervals between group means at 3 months adjusted for outcome at baseline and for the difference between unadjusted group proportions.

Results

clinical and electrophysiological parameters were similar at baseline in both groups. Improvements were significantly more pronounced in the LLLT group than placebo group. A comparison between groups showed significant improvements in pain score and functional status scale score. Group mean differences at 3 months adjusted at baseline were found to be statistically significant for pain score and functional status scale score. The 95% significant confidence intervals were [-15 - (-5)] and [-5 - (-2)] respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in other clinical and electrophysiological parameters between groups at 3 months.

Conclusions

our study results indicate that LLLT and placebo laser therapy seems to be effective for pain and hand function in CTS. We, therefore, suggest that LLLT may be used as a good alternative treatment method in CTS patients with RA.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.