Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2007Financiación no declarada

Creatine supplementation does not reduce muscle damage or enhance recovery from resistance exercise

Rawson ES, Conti MP, Miles MP

Journal of strength and conditioning research · 33 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2007-01-01 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 21 · número 4 · pág. 1208
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
57 citas · más que el 78% de estudios similares · 1.4× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
37 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports Performance and Training
Palabras clave
creatine supplementation, muscle damage, resistance training, post-exercise recovery, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, muscle soreness, maximal strength, range of motion, squatting, skeletal muscle
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, pain, athletic injuries, creatine, l-lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, c-reactive protein, range of motion, articular, treatment outcome, exercise, recovery of function, dietary supplements, adult, male, muscle strength, biomarkers

3 autores

  • Eric S. Rawson🇺🇸Bloomsburg University
  • Michael P. Conti
  • Mary P. Miles

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Previous studies have shown that creatine supplementation reduces muscle damage and inflammation following running but not following high-force, eccentric exercise. Although the mechanical strain placed on muscle fibers during high-force, eccentric exercise may be too overwhelming for creatine to exert any protective effect, creatine supplementation may protect skeletal muscle stressed by a resistance training challenge that is more hypoxic in nature. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of short-term creatine supplementation on markers of muscle damage (i.e., strength, range of motion, muscle soreness, muscle serum protein activity, C-reactive protein) to determine whether creatine supplementation offers protective effects on skeletal muscle following a hypoxic resistance exercise test. Twenty-two healthy, weight-trained men (19-27 years) ingested either creatine or a placebo for 10 days. Following 5 days of supplementation, subjects performed a squat exercise protocol (5 sets of 15-20 repetitions at 50% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]). Assessments of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase activity, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, maximal strength, range of motion (ROM), and muscle soreness (SOR) with movement and palpation were conducted pre-exercise and during a 5-day follow up. Following the exercise test, maximal strength and ROM decreased, whereas SOR and CK increased. Creatine and placebo-supplemented subjects experienced significant decreases in maximal strength (creatine: 13.4 kg, placebo: 17.5 kg) and ROM (creatine: 2.4 degrees , placebo: 3.0 degrees ) immediately postexercise, with no difference between groups. Following the exercise test, there were significant increases in SOR with movement and palpation (p < 0.05 at 24, 48, and 72 hours postexercise), and CK activity (p < 0.05 at 24 and 48 hours postexercise), with no differences between groups at any time. These data suggest that oral creatine supplementation does not reduce skeletal muscle damage or enhance recovery following a hypoxic resistance exercise challenge.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.