Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2008Financiación no declarada

Comparison of therapeutic effects of omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid and fluoxetine, separately and in combination, in major depressive disorder

Jazayeri S, Tehrani-Doost M, Keshavarz SA, Hosseini M, Djazayery A, Amini H, Jalali M, Peet M

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 147 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2008-01-01 · Aust N Z J Psychiatry · vol. 42 · número 3 · págs. 192–198
Editorial
SAGE Publishing
Citado
215 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 11.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
40 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Treatment of Major Depression · Tryptophan and brain disorders
Palabras clave
eicosapentaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, fluoxetine, major depressive disorder, combination therapy, antidepressant efficacy, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH
humans, fluoxetine, eicosapentaenoic acid, antidepressive agents, drug therapy, combination, severity of illness index, double-blind method, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, adult, female, male, surveys and questionnaires, major depressive disorder

8 autores

  • Shima Jazayeri🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaRoozbeh Hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Mehdi Tehrani‐Doost🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaTehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Seyed Ali Keshavarz🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaRoozbeh Hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Mostafa Hosseini🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Abolghassem Djazayery🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaRoozbeh Hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Homayoun Amini‎🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Mahmoud Jalali🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaRoozbeh Hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Malcolm Peet

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To compare therapeutic effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), fluoxetine and a combination of them in major depression.

Method

Sixty outpatients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder based on DSM-IV criteria and a score >or=15 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) were randomly allocated to receive daily either 1000 mg EPA or 20 mg fluoxetine, or their combination for 8 weeks. Double dummy technique was used to double blind the study. Patients were assessed at 2 week intervals. Change in HDRS was the primary outcome measure.

Results

Analysis of covariance for HDRS at week 8 across treatment groups was performed in 48 patients who completed at least 4 weeks of the study, with the last observation carried forward. Treatment, age of onset and baseline HDRS had a significant effect on HDRS at week 8. EPA + fluoxetine combination was significantly better than fluoxetine or EPA alone from the fourth week of treatment. Fluoxetine and EPA appear to be equally effective in controlling depressive symptoms. Response rates (>or=50% decrease in baseline HDRS) were 50%, 56% and 81% in the fluoxetine, EPA and combination groups, respectively.

Conclusions

In the present 8 week trial EPA and fluoxetine had equal therapeutic effects in major depressive disorder. EPA + fluoxetine combination was superior to either of them alone.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.