Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado1991

A phase III comparison trial of streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, and caffeine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Kelsen D, Hudis C, Niedzwiecki D, Dougherty J, Casper E, Botet J, Vinciguerra V, Rosenbluth R

Cancer · 55 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Cancer Institute (2-P01-CA-05826); National Cancer Institute (CA 37446)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
1991-09-01 · Cancer · vol. 68 · número 5 · págs. 965–969
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
77 citas · más que el 76% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment · Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Palabras clave
advanced pancreatic cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, cisplatin, cytarabine, caffeine, streptozotocin, mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, combination chemotherapy, chemotherapy response, survival, chemotherapy toxicity, palliative chemotherapy
MeSH
humans, adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neoplasms, cyclophosphamide, streptozocin, carboplatin, mitomycins, fluorouracil, caffeine, antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, clinical trials as topic

8 autores

  • David Paul Kelsen🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
  • Clifford A. Hudis🇺🇸Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
  • Donna Niedzwiecki🇺🇸Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
  • James Dougherty🇺🇸Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
  • Ephraim S. Casper🇺🇸Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
  • Jose F. Botet🇺🇸Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Cornell University
  • Vincent P. Vinciguerra
  • Richard J. Rosenbluth

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Conventional chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has had little effect on palliation or survival. Almost all studies of systemic therapy have involved empiric use of a variety of Phase II or conventional agents alone or in combination. On the basis of recent studies using a human tumor pancreatic cancer (PC) xenograft in nude mice, a Phase I clinical trial of cisplatin, high-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), and caffeine (CAC) was performed in patients with advanced incurable PC. A tolerable dose and schedule of the three agents were developed. Seven of 18 patients with measurable disease in this Phase I trial had partial responses to CAC. A Phase III comparison of CAC versus standard treatment using streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil (SMF) was performed. Eighty-two patients with advanced PC were entered into this random assignment trial. The two treatment arms were well balanced for the usual prognostic factors. Although the acute (e.g., nausea and vomiting) toxicities of CAC were greater than those of SMF, both groups of patients tolerated treatment resonably well. Ninety percent of patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (5.5%) on the CAC treatment arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 15%) and four patients (10.2%) on the SMF treatment arm (95% CI, 1% to 22%) had objective responses (partial response in measurable disease or improvement in evaluable disease). No complete remissions were observed. The 95% confidence limits of response for CAC and SMF overlapped. The median duration of survival for all patients on the SMF treatment arm was 10 months, although it was 5 months on the CAC treatment arm (P = 0.008). In this Phase III comparison, CAC was not superior to conventional therapy with SMF in terms of response and was inferior for survival. Neither regimen is effective treatment for advanced PC.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.