Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2008Financiación no declarada

Low level laser therapy for nonspecific low-back pain

Yousefi-Nooraie R, Schonstein E, Heidari K, Rashidian A, Pennick V, Akbari-Kamrani M, Irani S, Shakiba B, Mortaz Hejri SA, Mortaz Hejri SO, Jonaidi A

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 62 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2008-04-21 · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · vol. 2011 · número 2 · pág. CD005107
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
125 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 7.9× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
71 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Pain Management and Treatment
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, non-specific low back pain, chronic low back pain, subacute low back pain, analgesia, disability, exercise therapy, sham treatment, relapse rate, musculoskeletal disorders
MeSH
humans, low back pain, female, male, randomized controlled trials as topic, low-level light therapy

11 autores

  • Reza Yousefi Nooraie🇨🇦McMaster University
  • Eva Schönstein🇦🇺The University of Sydney
  • Kazem Heidari🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Arash Rashidian🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Victoria Pennick🇨🇦Institute for Work & Health
  • Marjan Akbari-Kamrani🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Shirin Irani🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Behnam Shakiba🇮🇷Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
  • Sara Mortaz Hejri🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • A Jonaidi🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Soroush Mortaz‐Hedjri🇮🇷Shariati Hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Low-back pain (LBP) is a major health problem and a major cause of medical expenses and disablement. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) can be used to treat musculoskeletal disorders such as back pain.

Objectives

To assess the effects of LLLT in patients with non-specific LBP.

Search strategy

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 2), MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, AMED and PEDro from their start to November 2007 with no language restrictions. We screened references in the included studies and in reviews and conducted citation tracking of identified RCTs and reviews using Science Citation Index. We also contacted content experts.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating LLLT to treat non-specific low-back pain were included.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently assessed methodological quality using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group and extracted data. Studies were qualitatively and quantitatively analysed according to Cochrane Back Review Group guideline.

Main results

Seven heterogeneous English language RCTs with reasonable quality were included. Three small studies (168 people) separately showed statistically significant but clinically unimportant pain relief for LLLT versus sham therapy for sub-acute and chronic low-back pain at short-term and intermediate-term follow-up (up to six months). One study (56 people) showed that LLLT was more effective than sham at reducing disability in the short term. Three studies (102 people) reported that LLLT plus exercise were not better than exercise, with or without sham in the short-term in reducing pain or disability. Two studies (90 people) reported that LLLT was not more effective than exercise, with or without sham in reducing pain or disability in the short term. Two small trials (151 people) independently found that the relapse rate in the LLLT group was significantly lower than in the control group at the six-month follow-up. No side effects were reported.

Authors' conclusions

Based on the heterogeneity of the populations, interventions and comparison groups, we conclude that there are insufficient data to draw firm conclusions on the clinical effect of LLLT for low-back pain. There is a need for further methodologically rigorous RCTs to evaluate the effects of LLLT compared to other treatments, different lengths of treatment, wavelengths and dosages.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.