Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2009Financiación no declarada

Global vitamin D levels in relation to age, gender, skin pigmentation and latitude: an ecologic meta-regression analysis

Hagenau T, Vest R, Gissel TN, Poulsen CS, Erlandsen M, Mosekilde L, Vestergaard P

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 262 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2008-05-05 · Osteoporos Int · vol. 20 · número 1 · págs. 133–140
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
440 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 16.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
33 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Skin Protection and Aging · Nutrition and Health Studies
Palabras clave
vitamin D status, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D deficiency, latitude, skin pigmentation, ethnicity, age differences, sex differences
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, skin pigmentation, incidence, regression analysis, cross-sectional studies, ecology, sunlight, age factors, sex factors, adolescent, adult, aged, middle aged, child, female, male, global health, ethnicity, white people

7 autores

  • T. Hagenau🇩🇰Aarhus University Hospital
  • R. Vest🇩🇰Aarhus University Hospital
  • Tina Gissel🇩🇰Aarhus University Hospital
  • Carsten Søndergaard Poulsen🇩🇰Aarhus University Hospital
  • Mogens Erlandsen🇩🇰Aarhus University
  • Leif Mosekilde🇩🇰Aarhus University Hospital
  • Peter Vestergaard🇩🇰 · autor de correspondenciaAarhus University Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Unlabelled

We performed a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies on serum 25(OH)D status globally. Serum 25(OH)D levels on average were 54 nmol/l, were higher in women than men, and higher in Caucasians than in non-Caucasians. There was no trend in serum 25(OH)D level with latitude. Vitamin D deficiency was widespread.

Introduction

We studied vitamin D status (expressed as serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D]) in native subjects worldwide.

Methods

Meta-analysis and meta-regression of studies reporting on 25(OH)D in healthy subjects retrieved from Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science using the terms "serum", "25-hydroxy-vitamin D", "cholecalciferol", and "human". A total of 394 studies were included.

Results

The mean 25(OH)D level was 54 nmol/l (95% CI: 52-57 nmol/l). Women had borderline significantly higher 25(OH)D levels than men, and Caucasians had higher levels than non-Caucasians. 25(OH)D levels were higher in subjects aged >15 years than in younger subjects. Unadjusted there was no significant decrease in 25(OH)D with latitude (slope of curve -0.03 +/- 0.12 nmol/l per degree latitude north or south of equator, p = 0.8). There was a significant decline with latitude for Caucasians (-0.69 +/- 0.30 nmol/l per degree, p = 0.02), but not for non-Caucasians (0.03 +/- 0.39 nmol/l per degree, p = 0.14). After adjustment for age, gender, and ethnicity, no overall correlation was present between 25(OH)D and latitude (-0.29 +/- 0.24 nmol/l per degree, p = 0.23).

Conclusion

There was no overall influence of latitude on 25(OH)D. However, in separate analyses 25(OH)D decreased with latitude in Caucasians but not in non-Caucasians. A widespread global vitamin D insufficiency was present compared with proposed threshold levels.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.