Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2008Financiación no declarada

Caffeine supplementation and multiple sprint running performance

Glaister M, Howatson G, Abraham CS, Lockey RA, Goodwin JE, Foley P, McInnes G

Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 88 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2008-09-16 · Med Sci Sports Exerc · vol. 40 · número 10 · págs. 1835–1840
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
162 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 5.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Sports Performance and Training · Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Palabras clave
caffeine supplementation, sprint performance, ergogenic aids, fatigue, blood lactate, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, caffeine metabolites
MeSH
humans, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, double-blind method, heart rate, running, adult, male, athletic performance

7 autores

  • Mark Glaister🇬🇧St Mary's University Twickenham London; St Mary's University College
  • Glyn Howatson🇬🇧St Mary's University Twickenham London; St Mary's University College
  • Corinne S. Abraham🇬🇧St Mary's University Twickenham London; St Mary's University College
  • Richard A. Lockey🇬🇧St Mary's University Twickenham London; St Mary's University College
  • Jon E. Goodwin🇬🇧St Mary's University Twickenham London; St Mary's University College
  • PAUL FOLEY🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
  • Gillian McInnes🇬🇧St Mary's University Twickenham London; St Mary's University College

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of caffeine supplementation on multiple sprint running performance.

Methods

Using a randomized double-blind research design, 21 physically active men ingested a gelatin capsule containing either caffeine (5 mg x kg(-1) body mass) or placebo (maltodextrin) 1 h before completing an indoor multiple sprint running trial (12 x 30 m; repeated at 35-s intervals). Venous blood samples were drawn to evaluate plasma caffeine and primary metabolite concentrations. Sprint times were recorded via twin-beam photocells, and earlobe blood samples were drawn to evaluate pretest and posttest lactate concentrations. Heart rate was monitored continuously throughout the tests, with RPE recorded after every third sprint.

Results

Relative to placebo, caffeine supplementation resulted in a 0.06-s (1.4%) reduction in fastest sprint time (95% likely range = 0.04-0.09 s), which corresponded with a 1.2% increase in fatigue (95% likely range = 0.3-2.2%). Caffeine supplementation also resulted in a 3.4-bpm increase in mean heart rate (95% likely range = 0.1-6.6 bpm) and elevations in pretest (+0.7 mmol x L(-1); 95% likely range = 0.1-1.3 mmol x L(-1)) and posttest (+1.8 mmol x L(-1); 95% likely range = 0.3-3.2 mmol x L(-1)) blood lactate concentrations. In contrast, there was no significant effect of caffeine supplementation on RPE.

Conclusion

Although the effect of recovery duration on caffeine-induced responses to multiple sprint work requires further investigation, the results of the present study show that caffeine has ergogenic properties with the potential to benefit performance in both single and multiple sprint sports.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.