Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2009Financiación no declarada

The relationship between reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by statins and reduction in risk of cardiovascular outcomes: an updated meta-analysis

Delahoy PJ, Magliano DJ, Webb K, Grobler M, Liew D

Clinical therapeutics · 121 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2009-02-01 · Clin Ther · vol. 31 · número 2 · págs. 236–244
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
168 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 20.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
37 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Palabras clave
statins, LDL cholesterol lowering, cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular events, vascular death, major coronary events, stroke, pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, anticholesteremic agents, hydroxymethylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitors, risk factors, regression analysis, cholesterol, ldl, clinical trials as topic

5 autores

  • Philippa J. Delahoy🇦🇺Pfizer (Australia)
  • Dianna J. Magliano🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute; Monash University
  • Kate Webb🇦🇺Pfizer (Australia)
  • Mendel P. Grobler🇦🇺Pfizer (Australia)
  • Danny Liew🇦🇺The University of Melbourne; St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

In 2005, the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (CTTC) quantified the relationship between reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) achieved by statin treatment and reduction in cardiovascular risk. Since this publication, several large statin trials have been reported.

Objective

The objective of our analysis was to extend the CTTC results by including active-controlled trials and other trials published since 2005.

Methods

A literature search in English (1966-December 2008) was undertaken of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent drug file databases, and the Cochrane library using standard MESH terms (cardiovascular disease, death, fatal outcome, pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to identify randomized trials of statins (placebo controlled, active controlled, or usual care) that reported clinical outcomes, enrolled >1000 subjects, and followed them up for > or =1 year. Random effects meta-regression was used to analyze the relationship between absolute changes in LDL-C and risk for cardiovascular events.

Results

Twenty-five trials were included in a primary analysis involving 155,613 subjects, 6321 vascular deaths, 23,791 major vascular events, 11,357 major coronary events, and 4717 strokes. For every 25-mg/dL (0.65-mmol/L) reduction in LDL-C, the relative risk (95% CI) for various cardiovascular outcomes was as follows: vascular mortality, 0.89 (0.87-0.92); major vascular events, 0.86 (0.84-0.88); major coronary events, 0.84 (0.82-0.86); and stroke, 0.90 (0.86-0.94).

Conclusions

Based on meta-regression analysis of these trials, there was a significant positive relationship between reduction in LDL-C and reduction in the risk for major cardiovascular events. These results support and extend the findings of the CTTC.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.