Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation
Abut E, Guveli H, Yasar B, Bolukbas C, Bolukbas FF, Ince AT, Kendir T, Dalay AR, Kurdas OO
Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 17 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2009-06-25 · Gastrointest Endosc · vol. 70 · número 3 · págs. 515–521
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 30 citas · más que el 78% de estudios similares · 1.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 20 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Gastrointestinal motility and disorders · Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Palabras clave
- bowel preparation, polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution, olive oil, magnesium hydroxide, laxatives, patient satisfaction, bowel cleansing adequacy, low-volume bowel preparation
- MeSH
- humans, polyethylene glycols, plant oils, cathartics, colonoscopy, drug therapy, combination, administration, oral, probability, sensitivity and specificity, prospective studies, reference values, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, therapeutic irrigation, olive oil
9 autores
- Evren Abut🇹🇷 · autor de correspondenciaHaydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
- Hakan Güveli🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Bülent Yaşar🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Cengiz Bölükbaş🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Filiz Füsun Bölükbaş🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Ali Tüzün İnce🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Tülin Kendir🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Ali Remzi Dalay🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
- Oya Övünç Kurdaş🇹🇷Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi; Harran University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Proper bowel cleansing before colonoscopy is essential for satisfactory evaluation of the colon. The required consumption of a large volume of salty-tasting liquid, 4 L of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS), is the primary limitation to achieving this goal.
Objective
To achieve better patient satisfaction with efficient bowel cleansing, we compared the effects of the conventional volume (4 L) of PEG-ELS with those of a low volume (2 L) in combination with pretreatment using different laxatives, such as magnesium hydroxide (milk of magnesia) and olive oil.
Design
Randomized, controlled study.
Setting
A single research hospital.
Patients
Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.
Interventions
A total of 120 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 different preparation regimens: 39 patients were prepared with a conventional volume (4 L) of PEG-ELS (Preparation [Prep] 1), and the remaining patients were prepared with a lower volume (2 L) of PEG-ELS and pretreatment with a laxative, either 15 g of magnesium hydroxide (40 patients, Prep 2) or 60 mL of olive oil (41 patients, Prep 3) 3 hours before PEG-ELS administration.
Main outcome measurements
The primary outcome was the efficacy of colonic cleansing on the left and right sides. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and side effects.
Results
The olive oil regimen (Prep 3) resulted in significantly more adequate bowel cleansing of the right colon than administration of the conventional volume of PEG-ELS (Prep 1) and the magnesium hydroxide (Prep 2) regimen (97.6% vs 74.5% and 72.5%, respectively, P = .007). However, this difference was not observed in the left colon (91.5%, 85.5%, and 91.8% for Preps 1, 2, and 3, respectively, P = .776). When asked, 38 patients (95%) taking Prep 2, 35 patients (85.3%) taking Prep 3, and only 11 patients (28.2%) taking Prep 1 preferred the same preparation regimen if they required a future colonoscopy (P =.006), based on ease of use and taste. The side effects were comparable in each group.
Limitations
The limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size, the single-center study design, and the use of a nonvalidated symptom scoring system.
Conclusion
Pretreatment with olive oil before administration of a low volume of PEG-ELS enhances both patient satisfaction and the quality of right-side colonic cleansing over the administration of the conventional volume of PEG-ELS for colonoscopy preparation. Although the magnesium hydroxide regimen (Prep 2) was the preferred regimen in this study, its colonic cleansing effectiveness was not as great as those of the other regimens. Based on our results, the olive oil regimen is recommended, especially for patients who are not able to consume large volumes of liquids, such as the elderly, and those who are suspected of having subtle right-side colonic lesions.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.