Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2009Financiación no declarada

Treatment of vitamin D deficiency increases lower limb muscle strength in institutionalized older people independently of regular physical activity: a randomized double-blind controlled trial

Moreira-Pfrimer LD, Pedrosa MA, Teixeira L, Lazaretti-Castro M

Annals of nutrition & metabolism · 99 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2009-01-01 · Ann Nutr Metab · vol. 54 · número 4 · págs. 291–300
Editorial
Karger Publishers
Citado
178 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 8.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Nutrition and Health Studies
Palabras clave
vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D3 supplementation, calcium supplementation, institutionalized elderly, lower limb muscle strength, hip flexors, knee extensors, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, seasonal variation, hypercalcemia, physical inactivity
MeSH
lower extremity, humans, vitamin d deficiency, calcium, phosphorus, cholecalciferol, calcifediol, parathyroid hormone, double-blind method, seasons, dietary supplements, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, homes for the aged, nursing homes, female, male, muscle strength, surveys and questionnaires

4 autores

  • Linda Denise Fernandes Moreira🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Márcia Alessandra Carneiro Pedrosa🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Luzimar Raimundo Teixeira🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Marise Lazaretti‐Castro🇧🇷Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Aims

To investigate the effects of a 6-month supplementation with calcium and cholecalciferol on biochemical parameters and muscle strength of institutionalized elderly.

Methods

This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial included Brazilian institutionalized people > or =60 years of age receiving a 6-month supplementation (December to May) of daily calcium plus monthly placebo (calcium/placebo group) or daily calcium plus oral cholecalciferol (150,000 IU once a month during the first 2 months, followed by 90,000 IU once a month for the last 4 months; calcium/vitamin D group). Fasting blood samples for 25(OH)D, PTH and calcium determination were collected (n = 56) and muscle tests were performed (n = 46) to measure the strength of hip flexors (SHF) and knee extensors (SKE) before (baseline) and after the 6-month intervention (6 months).

Results

Due to seasonal variations, serum 25(OH)D significantly enhanced in both groups after treatment, but the calcium/vitamin D group had significantly higher 25 (OH)D levels than the calcium/placebo group (84 vs. 33%, respectively; p < 0.0001). No cases of hypercalcemia were observed. While the calcium/placebo group showed no improvement in SHF and SKE at 6 months (p = 0.93 and p = 0.61, respectively), SHF was increased in the calcium/vitamin D group by 16.4% (p = 0.0001) and SKE by 24.6% (p = 0.0007).

Conclusions

The suggested cholecalciferol supplementation was safe and efficient in enhancing 25(OH)D levels and lower limb muscle strength in the elderly, in the absence of any regular physical exercise practice.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.