Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2010Financiado por la industriaVínculos de autores con la industriaAcceso abierto

Financiado en parte por GlaxoSmithKline

Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S

PLoS medicine · 741 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Organización sin fines de lucro
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Organización sin fines de lucro
Chicago Community Trust
Empresa
GlaxoSmithKline
Gobierno
World Health Organization
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Autores
Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
Subvenciones
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL 085710-01); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL085710); National Institutes of Health (R01-HL-085710)

Según 8 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2010-03-22 · PLoS Med · vol. 7 · número 3 · pág. e1000252
Editorial
Public Library of Science
Citado
1,218 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 11.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Palabras clave
polyunsaturated fatty acids, saturated fat replacement, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, dietary fat, cardiovascular risk reduction, study duration, meta-regression, dietary intervention trials, omega-3 fatty acids, omega-6 fatty acids, dietary guidelines, publication bias
MeSH
humans, coronary disease, dietary fats, fatty acids, fatty acids, unsaturated, feeding behavior, meta-analysis as topic, randomized controlled trials as topic

3 autores

  • Dariush Mozaffarian🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaBrigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Renata Micha🇺🇸Harvard University
  • Sarah K. Wallace🇺🇸Harvard University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Reduced saturated fat (SFA) consumption is recommended to reduce coronary heart disease (CHD), but there is an absence of strong supporting evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clinical CHD events and few guidelines focus on any specific replacement nutrient. Additionally, some public health groups recommend lowering or limiting polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) consumption, a major potential replacement for SFA.

Methods and findings

We systematically investigated and quantified the effects of increased PUFA consumption, as a replacement for SFA, on CHD endpoints in RCTs. RCTs were identified by systematic searches of multiple online databases through June 2009, grey literature sources, hand-searching related articles and citations, and direct contacts with experts to identify potentially unpublished trials. Studies were included if they randomized participants to increased PUFA for at least 1 year without major concomitant interventions, had an appropriate control group, and reported incidence of CHD (myocardial infarction and/or cardiac death). Inclusions/exclusions were adjudicated and data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two investigators and included population characteristics, control and intervention diets, follow-up duration, types of events, risk ratios, and SEs. Pooled effects were calculated using inverse-variance-weighted random effects meta-analysis. From 346 identified abstracts, eight trials met inclusion criteria, totaling 13,614 participants with 1,042 CHD events. Average weighted PUFA consumption was 14.9% energy (range 8.0%-20.7%) in intervention groups versus 5.0% energy (range 4.0%-6.4%) in controls. The overall pooled risk reduction was 19% (RR = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.95, p = 0.008), corresponding to 10% reduced CHD risk (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.83-0.97) for each 5% energy of increased PUFA, without evidence for statistical heterogeneity (Q-statistic p = 0.13; I(2) = 37%). Meta-regression identified study duration as an independent determinant of risk reduction (p = 0.017), with studies of longer duration showing greater benefits.

Conclusions

These findings provide evidence that consuming PUFA in place of SFA reduces CHD events in RCTs. This suggests that rather than trying to lower PUFA consumption, a shift toward greater population PUFA consumption in place of SFA would significantly reduce rates of CHD. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.