Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2010Financiación no declarada

The comparative efficacy of plant sterols and stanols on serum lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Talati R, Sobieraj DM, Makanji SS, Phung OJ, Coleman CI

Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 55 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2010-04-28 · J Am Diet Assoc · vol. 110 · número 5 · págs. 719–726
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
95 citas · más que el 90% de estudios similares · 2.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
34 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism · Natural Products and Biological Research
Palabras clave
phytosterols, plant stanols, serum lipids, hypercholesterolemia, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, dietary cholesterol absorption, cholesterol-lowering supplements, healthy volunteers, statin-sparing therapy, cardiovascular disease prevention, triglyceride lowering
MeSH
humans, sitosterols, phytosterols, triglycerides, anticholesteremic agents, treatment outcome, phytotherapy, lipid metabolism, cholesterol, ldl, hyperlipidemias, cholesterol, hdl, randomized controlled trials as topic

5 autores

  • Ripple Talati🇺🇸Hartford Hospital; University of Connecticut
  • Diana M Sobieraj
  • Sagar S Makanji
  • Olivia J Phung
  • Craig Ian Coleman · autor de correspondencia

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Plant sterols and stanols are plant steroids with a similar chemical structure and cellular function to human cholesterol, and are recommended as dietary modifiers of serum lipids. Plant sterols have a higher degree of absorption than plant stanols, suggesting differential efficacy between the two.

Design

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to summarize direct comparisons between the effect of plant sterols vs plant stanols on serum lipid levels in healthy patients and patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Methods

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database was conducted from January 1950 through January 2009. Trials were included in the analysis if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of plant sterols vs plant stanols in healthy patients or patients with hypercholesterolemia who reported efficacy data on total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterols or triglycerides. The weighted mean difference (WMD) of the change from baseline (in mg/dL) with 95% confidence interval was calculated as the difference between the means in the plant sterol and plant stanol groups using a random-effects model.

Results

Fourteen studies (n=531 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Upon meta-analysis, the results showed that there is no statistically or clinically significant difference between plant sterols and plant stanols in their abilities to modify total cholesterol (WMD -1.11 mg/dL [-0.0286 mmol/L], 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.12 to 1.90, P=0.47), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD -0.35 mg/dL [-0.0091 mmol/L], 95% CI -2.98 to 2.28, P=0.79), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD -0.28 mg/dL [-0.00073 mmol/L], 95% CI -1.18 to 0.62, P=0.54), or triglycerides (WMD -1.80 mg/dL [-0.0203 mmol/L], 95% CI -6.80 to 3.21, P=0.48).

Conclusions

Plant sterols and plant stanols do not have statistically or clinically relevant differing effects on total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or triglyceride levels. The selection of plant sterols vs plant stanols should then be based on potential differences in safety parameters and further study is required to elucidate such differences.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.