The predicted risk of head injury from fall-related impacts on to third-generation artificial turf and grass soccer surfaces: a comparative biomechanical analysis
Theobald P, Whitelegg L, Nokes LD, Jones MD
Sports biomechanics · 7 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio in vitro o de mecanismos (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Células o muestras de laboratorio
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2010-03-01 · Sports Biomech · vol. 9 · número 1 · págs. 29–37
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 17 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.5× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 18 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Sports injuries and prevention
- Palabras clave
- Head (geology), Range (aeronautics), Traumatic brain injury, Poison control, Environmental science, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Mathematics, Medicine, Geology, Materials science, Emergency medicine, Composite material
- MeSH
- humans, poaceae, brain injuries, athletic injuries, injury severity score, risk, accidental falls, soccer, biomechanical phenomena
4 autores
- Peter S. Theobald🇬🇧Cardiff University
- Liam Whitelegg🇬🇧Cardiff University
- Leonard Derek Martin Nokes🇬🇧Cardiff University
- Michael D. Jones🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaCardiff University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The risk of soccer players sustaining mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) following head impact with a playing surface is unclear. This study investigates MTBI by performing headform impact tests from varying heights onto a range of third-generation artificial turf surfaces. Each turf was prepared as per manufacturers specifications within a laboratory, before being tested immediately following installation and then again after a bedding-in period. Each turf was tested dry and when wetted to saturation. Data from the laboratory tests were compared to an in situ third-generation surface and a professional grass surface. The surface performance threshold was set at a head impact criterion (HIC) = 400, which equates to a 10% risk of the head impact causing MTBI. All six third-generation surfaces had a > 10% risk of MTBI from a fall > 0.77 m; the inferior surfaces required a fall from just 0.46 m to have a 10% MTBI risk. Wetting the artificial turf did not produce a statistically significant improvement (P > 0.01). The in situ third-generation playing surface produced HIC values within the range of bedded-in experimental values. However, the natural turf pitch was the superior performer--necessitating fall heights exceeding those achievable during games to achieve HIC = 400.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.