Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2010Financiación no declarada

Processed meat and colorectal cancer: a quantitative review of prospective epidemiologic studies

Alexander DD, Miller AJ, Cushing CA, Lowe KA

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 48 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2010-05-21 · Eur J Cancer Prev · vol. 19 · número 5 · págs. 328–341
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
80 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 7.5× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
67 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Palabras clave
processed meat, colorectal cancer, dietary risk factors, cancer risk, dose-response relationship, sex differences, cancer prevention
MeSH
humans, colorectal neoplasms, diet, risk assessment, prospective studies, meat products, female, male

4 autores

  • Dominik D. Alexander🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaExponent (United States)
  • Arthur J. Miller
  • Colleen A. Cushing🇺🇸Exponent (United States)
  • Kimberly Anne Lowe

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

A tremendous amount of scientific interest has been generated regarding processed meat consumption and cancer risk. Therefore, to estimate the association between processed meat intake and colorectal cancer (CRC), a meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted. Twenty-eight prospective studies of processed meat and CRC were identified, of which 20 represented independent nonoverlapping study populations. Summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for high versus low intake and dose-response relationships were calculated. The SRRE for high (vs. low) processed meat intake and CRC was 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.23] for all studies. Summary associations were modified considerably by sex; the SRRE for men was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07-1.42) and the SRRE for women was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.94-1.16), based on nine and 13 studies, respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not indicate appreciable statistical variation by tumor site, processed meat groups, or study location. The SRRE for each 30-gram increment of processed meat and CRC was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.15) based on nine studies, and the SRRE for each incremental serving of processed meat per week was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.05) based on six studies. Overall, summary associations were weak in magnitude (i.e. most less than 1.20), processed meat definitions and analytical comparisons were highly variable across studies, and isolating the independent effects of processed meat intake is difficult, given the likely influence of confounding by other dietary and lifestyle factors. Therefore, the currently available epidemiologic evidence is not sufficient to support a clear and unequivocal independent positive association between processed meat consumption and CRC.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.