Maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease using omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil): a systematic review and meta-analyses
Turner D, Shah PS, Steinhart AH, Zlotkin S, Griffiths AM
Inflammatory bowel diseases · 126 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2010-06-17 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · vol. 17 · número 1 · págs. 336–345
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 180 citas · más que el 67% de estudios similares · 1.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 68 trabajos
- Acceso
- Lectura gratuita
- Áreas de investigación
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease · Fatty Acid Research and Health · Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Palabras clave
- omega-3 fatty acids, fish oil
- MeSH
- humans, inflammatory bowel diseases, fatty acids, omega-3, remission induction, clinical trials as topic, review literature as topic
5 autores
- Dan Turner🇮🇱Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Shaare Zedek Medical Center; Bikur Cholim Hospital
- Prakesh S. Shah🇨🇦Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto
- A. Hillary Steinhart🇨🇦Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto
- Stanley Howard Zlotkin🇨🇦University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children
- Anne Marie Griffiths🇨🇦University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The objective was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of n-3 (omega-3 fatty acids, fish oil) for maintaining remission in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Electronic databases were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials of n-3 for maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Studies of patients of any age group who were in remission at the time of recruitment and were followed for at least 6 months were included. The primary outcome was relapse rate at the end of the follow-up period. Nine studies were eligible for inclusion; six studies of CD (n = 1039) and three of UC (n = 138). There was a statistically significant benefit for n-3 in CD (relative risk [RR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.98); however, the studies were heterogeneous (I(2) = 58%). The absolute risk reduction was -0.14 (95% CI: -0.25 to -0.02). Opinions may vary on whether this is a clinically significant effect. Two well-done studies with a larger sample size reported no benefit. A sensitivity analysis excluding a small pediatric study resulted in the pooled RR being no longer statistically significant. A funnel plot analysis suggested publication bias for the smaller studies. For UC, there was no difference in the relapse rate between the n-3 and control groups (RR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.51-2.03). The pooled analysis showed a higher rate of diarrhea (RR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.01-1.84) and symptoms of the upper gastrointestinal tract (RR 1.96; 95% CI: 1.37-2.80) in the n-3 treatment group. There are insufficient data to recommend the use of omega 3 fatty acids for maintenance of remission in CD and UC.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.