Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2011Financiación no declarada

The efficacy of omega-3 supplementation for major depression: a randomized controlled trial

Lespérance F, Frasure-Smith N, St-André E, Turecki G, Lespérance P, Wisniewski SR

The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 101 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2010-06-15 · J Clin Psychiatry · vol. 72 · número 08 · págs. 1054–1062
Editorial
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Citado
149 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 11.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
0 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Treatment of Major Depression · Tryptophan and brain disorders
Palabras clave
omega-3 fatty acids, fish oil supplementation, major depressive episode, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, depressive symptoms, comorbid anxiety disorders, antidepressant treatment, outpatients, mood stabilizers, mood stabilizer side effects
MeSH
humans, fatty acids, omega-3, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, fish oils, plant oils, double-blind method, anxiety disorders, comorbidity, adult, middle aged, female, male, sunflower oil, major depressive disorder

6 autores

  • François Lespérance🇨🇦 · autor de correspondenciaCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal
  • Nancy Frasure‐Smith
  • Elise St-André
  • Gustavo Turecki
  • Paul Lespérance
  • Stephen R. Wisniewski

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

To document the short-term efficacy of omega-3 supplementation in reducing depressive symptoms in patients experiencing a major depressive episode (MDE).

Method

Inclusive, double-blind, randomized, controlled, 8-week, parallel-group trial, conducted October 17, 2005 through January 30, 2009 in 8 Canadian academic and psychiatric clinics. Adult outpatients (N = 432) with MDE (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, version 5.0.0, criteria) lasting at least 4 weeks, including 40.3% taking antidepressants at baseline, were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of 1,050 mg/d of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 150 mg/d of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or matched sunflower oil placebo (2% fish oil). The primary outcome was the self-report Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR(30)); the secondary outcome was the clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

Results

The adjusted mean difference between treatment and placebo was 1.32 points (95% CI, -0.20 to 2.84; P = .088) on the IDS-SR(30) and 0.97 points (95% CI, -0.012 to 1.95; P = .053) on the MADRS. Planned subgroup analyses revealed a significant interaction of comorbid anxiety disorders and study group (P = .035). For patients without comorbid anxiety disorders (n = 204), omega-3 supplementation was superior to placebo, with an adjusted mean difference of 3.17 points on the IDS-SR(30) (95% CI, 0.89 to 5.45; P = .007) and 1.93 points (95% CI, 0.50 to 3.36; P = .008) on the MADRS.

Conclusions

In this heterogeneous sample of patients with MDE, there was only a trend toward superiority of omega-3 supplementation over placebo in reducing depressive symptoms. However, there was a clear benefit of omega-3 supplementation among patients with MDE without comorbid anxiety disorders.

Trial registration

controlled-trials.com Identifier: ISRCTN47431149.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.