Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2010

Genotoxic and carcinogenic risks associated with the consumption of repeatedly boiled sunflower oil

Srivastava S, Singh M, George J, Bhui K, Shukla Y

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 23 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio en animales (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Animales
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2010-10-01 · J Agric Food Chem · vol. 58 · número 20 · págs. 11179–11186
Editorial
American Chemical Society
Citado
46 citas · más que el 73% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment · Radiation Effects and Dosimetry · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Palabras clave
Carcinogen, Chemistry, Food science, Micronucleus test, Sunflower oil, Lipid peroxidation, Superoxide dismutase, Alkaline phosphatase, Oxidative stress, Sunflower, Catalase, Glutathione, Toxicology, Biochemistry, Toxicity, Enzyme, Biology
MeSH
liver, animals, humans, rats, rats, wistar, chromosome aberrations, reactive oxygen species, plant oils, carcinogens, mutagens, oxidative stress, male, hot temperature, cooking, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, sunflower oil

5 autores

  • Smita Srivastava🇮🇳Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; Indian Institute of Toxicology Research
  • Madhulika Singh🇮🇳Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; Indian Institute of Toxicology Research
  • Jasmine George🇮🇳Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; Indian Institute of Toxicology Research
  • Kulpreet Bhui🇮🇳Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; Indian Institute of Toxicology Research
  • Yogeshwer Shukla🇮🇳 · autor de correspondenciaCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research; Indian Institute of Toxicology Research

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Repeated boiling of vegetable oils at high temperature in cooking and frying is a very common practice and leads to the formation of a class of toxic substances. Among them, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are well-documented for their mutagenic/carcinogenic potential. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the genotoxic and carcinogenic risks associated with the consumption of repeatedly boiled sunflower oil, which is one of the commonly consumed vegetable oils in southeast Asian countries. The presence of PAHs was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods in fresh, single-boiled, and repeatedly-boiled sunflower oil (FSO, SBSO, and RBSO) samples. A higher amount of known carcinogenic/mutagenic PAHs in RBSO samples were shown, as compared to FSO and SBSO. Oral administration of RBSO in Wistar rats resulted in significant induction of aberrant cells (p < 0.05) and micronuclei (p < 0.05) incidence in a dose-dependent manner. Oxidative stress analysis also showed a significant decrease in levels of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase and catalase, with a concurrent increase in reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation in animals following RBSO consumption, as compared to FSO or SBSO (p < 0.05). Additionally, RBSO administration alone and along with diethylnitrosamine for 12 weeks induced altered hepatic foci, as noticed by the alteration in positive (γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and glutathione-S-transferase) and negative (adenosine-triphosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and glucose-6-phosphatase) liver biomarkers. A significant decrease in the relative and absolute hepatic weight in RBSO-supplemented rats was also noted (p < 0.05).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.