The effects of polyethylene glycosylated creatine supplementation on muscular strength and power
Camic CL, Hendrix CR, Housh TJ, Zuniga JM, Mielke M, Johnson GO, Schmidt RJ, Housh DJ
Journal of strength and conditioning research · 12 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2010-11-11 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 24 · número 12 · págs. 3343–3351
- Editorial
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Citado
- 16 citas · más que el 66% de estudios similares · 0.6× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 30 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Biochemical effects in animals
- Palabras clave
- creatine supplementation, muscle strength, muscle power, one-repetition maximum, bench press, leg extension, Wingate test, untrained men, resistance training
- MeSH
- muscle, skeletal, humans, polyethylene glycols, creatine, placebos, exercise test, anthropometry, administration, oral, analysis of variance, double-blind method, reproducibility of results, energy intake, dietary supplements, male, muscle strength, young adult
8 autores
- Clayton L. Camic🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
- C. Russell Hendrix🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
- Terry J. Housh🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
- Jorge M. Zuñiga🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
- Michelle M. Mielke🇺🇸University of the Pacific
- Glen O. Johnson🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
- Richard J. Schmidt🇺🇸University of Nebraska–Lincoln
- Dona J. Housh🇺🇸University of Nebraska Medical Center
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the effects of 28 days of polyethylene glycosylated creatine (PEG-creatine) supplementation on 1-repetition maximum bench press (1RMBP) and leg extension (1RMLE), mean power (MP), and peak power (PP) from the Wingate Anaerobic test and body weight (BW). This study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design. Twenty-two untrained men (mean age ± SD = 22.1 ± 2.1 years) were randomly assigned to either a Creatine (n = 10) or Placebo (n = 12) group. The Creatine group ingested PEG-creatine (5 g·d), whereas the Placebo group ingested maltodextrin powder (5 g·d). All subjects performed bench press and bilateral leg extension exercises to determine their 1RM values, and 2 consecutive Wingate Anaerobic Tests (separated by 7 minutes) on a cycle ergometer to determine MP and PP before supplementation (day 0) and after 7 (day 7) and 28 (day 28) days of supplementation. The results indicated that there was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in 1RMBP between days 0 and 28 for the Creatine group but not for the Placebo group. There were no significant changes, however, in 1RMLE, MP, PP, or BW for the Creatine or Placebo group. These findings indicated that 28 days of PEG-creatine supplementation without resistance training increased upper body strength but not lower body strength or muscular power. These findings supported the use of the PEG-creatine supplement for increasing 1RMBP strength in untrained individuals.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.