Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2011Financiación no declarada

Vitamin D status and mortality risk in CKD: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Pilz S, Iodice S, Zittermann A, Grant WB, Gandini S

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 208 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2011-06-19 · Am J Kidney Dis · vol. 58 · número 3 · págs. 374–382
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
299 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 4.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
51 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Palabras clave
vitamin D status, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, chronic kidney disease, all-cause mortality, vitamin D deficiency, survival, dialysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate
MeSH
humans, kidney failure, chronic, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, glomerular filtration rate, renal dialysis, risk factors, prospective studies

5 autores

  • Stefan Pilz🇦🇹🇳🇱Medical University of Graz; Amsterdam Public Health; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Simona Iodice🇮🇹European Institute of Oncology
  • Armin Zittermann🇩🇪Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia; Ruhr University Bochum
  • William Burgess Grant🇺🇸Sunlight Nutrition and Health Research Center
  • Sara Gandini🇮🇹 · autor de correspondenciaEuropean Institute of Oncology

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Vitamin D deficiency, assessed as low 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level, is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with various adverse health outcomes. Whether low 25(OH)D levels in patients with CKD are an independent risk factor for mortality remains to be studied in detail, and this was the objective of our work.

Study design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies.

Setting & population

Patients with CKD. CKD was diagnosed mainly as decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Selection criteria for studies

We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, ISI, and EMBASE to identify prospective studies reporting on 25(OH)D levels and mortality.

Predictor

25(OH)D serum concentrations.

Outcome

All-cause mortality.

Results

10 studies with an overall sample of 6,853 patients with CKD were included. Relative risk of mortality per 10-ng/mL (25-nmol/L) increase in 25(OH)D level was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), with no indication of publication bias or significant heterogeneity (I(2) =15%; P = 0.3). Summary estimates for CKD cohorts with and without dialysis treatment showed homogeneous results (P = 0.9).

Limitations

Results may be limited by heterogeneity, unconsidered confounders, and the observational design of the studies. Furthermore, publication bias by unpublished null findings on the association of 25(OH)D level and mortality cannot be ruled out and ascertainment of CKD was based largely on estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Conclusions

Higher 25(OH)D levels are associated with significantly improved survival in patients with CKD. Whether treatment of low 25(OH)D level using natural vitamin D supplementation improves survival in patients with CKD remains to be elucidated in randomized controlled trials.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.