Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2011Financiación no declarada

High-dose docosahexaenoic acid supplementation of preterm infants: respiratory and allergy outcomes

Manley BJ, Makrides M, Collins CT, McPhee AJ, Gibson RA, Ryan P, Sullivan TR, Davis PG, DINO Steering Committee

Pediatrics · 99 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2011-06-28 · Pediatrics · vol. 128 · número 1 · págs. e71–e77
Editorial
American Academy of Pediatrics
Citado
146 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 9.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
29 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Infant Nutrition and Health · Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Palabras clave
docosahexaenoic acid, preterm infants, breast milk supplementation, tuna oil, soybean oil, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, atopic diseases, allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, omega-3 fatty acids, birth weight, sex differences
MeSH
humans, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hypersensitivity, docosahexaenoic acids, double-blind method, time factors, dietary supplements, infant, newborn, infant, premature, female, male

8 autores

  • Brett James Manley🇦🇺Royal Women's Hospital; The University of Melbourne; Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • Maria Makrides🇦🇺Women's and Children's Hospital; Flinders Medical Centre; Women's & Children's Health Research Institute
  • Carmel T Collins🇦🇺Women's and Children's Hospital; Flinders Medical Centre; Women's & Children's Health Research Institute
  • Andrew J McPhee🇦🇺Women's and Children's Hospital; Women's and Children's Health Network
  • Robert Alan Gibson🇦🇺Women's and Children's Hospital; Flinders Medical Centre; Women's & Children's Health Research Institute
  • Philip Ryan
  • Thomas Sullivan🇦🇺The University of Adelaide
  • Peter Graham Davis🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaRoyal Women's Hospital; The University of Melbourne; Murdoch Children's Research Institute

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been associated with downregulation of inflammatory responses.

Objective

To report the effect of DHA supplementation on long-term atopic and respiratory outcomes in preterm infants.

Methods

This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes for preterm infants <33 weeks' gestation who consumed expressed breast milk from mothers taking either tuna oil (high-DHA diet) or soy oil (standard-DHA) capsules. Data collected included incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and parental reporting of atopic conditions over the first 18 months of life.

Results

Six hundred fifty-seven infants were enrolled (322 to high-DHA diet, 335 to standard), and 93.5% completed the 18-month follow-up. There was a reduction in BPD in boys (relative risk [RR]: 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.96]; P=.03) and in all infants with a birth weight of <1250 g (RR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.57-0.98]; P=.04). There was no effect on duration of respiratory support, admission length, or home oxygen requirement. There was a reduction in reported hay fever in all infants in the high-DHA group at either 12 or 18 months (RR: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.18-0.91]; P=.03) and at either 12 or 18 months in boys (RR: 0.15 [0.03-0.64]; P=.01). There was no effect on asthma, eczema, or food allergy.

Conclusions

DHA supplementation for infants of <33 weeks' gestation reduced the incidence of BPD in boys and in all infants with a birth weight of <1250 g and reduced the incidence of reported hay fever in boys at either 12 or 18 months.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.