Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2011Alimentación controladaAcceso abierto

Postprandial lipid responses to an alpha-linolenic acid-rich oil, olive oil and butter in women: a randomized crossover trial

Svensson J, Rosenquist A, Ohlsson L

Lipids in health and disease · 10 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controlada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Lunds Universitet

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2011-06-28 · Lipids Health Dis · vol. 10 · número 1 · pág. 106
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
18 citas · más que el 81% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Edible Oils Quality and Analysis · Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Palabras clave
postprandial lipemia, alpha-linolenic acid, olive oil, butter, dietary fat composition, plasma triglycerides, free fatty acids, oleic acid, palmitic acid, n-6/n-3 ratio, women, premenopausal women, atherogenic risk
MeSH
humans, cholesterol, dietary fats, butter, alpha-linolenic acid, linseed oil, fatty acids, fatty acids, monounsaturated, triglycerides, lipoproteins, plant oils, cross-over studies, postprandial period, food, fortified, adult, middle aged, female, male, lipid metabolism, hyperlipidemias, olive oil, rapeseed oil

3 autores

  • Julia Svensson🇸🇪Lund University
  • Anna Rosenquist🇸🇪Lund University
  • Lena Ohlsson🇸🇪 · autor de correspondenciaLund University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Postprandial lipaemia varies with gender and the composition of dietary fat due to the partitioning of fatty acids between beta-oxidation and incorporation into triacylglycerols (TAGs). Increasing evidence highlights the importance of postprandial measurements to evaluate atherogenic risk. Postprandial effects of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) in women are poorly characterized. We therefore studied the postprandial lipid response of women to an ALA-rich oil in comparison with olive oil and butter, and characterized the fatty acid composition of total lipids, TAGs, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) in plasma.

Methods

A randomized crossover design (n = 19) was used to compare the postprandial effects of 3 meals containing 35 g fat. Blood samples were collected at regular intervals for 7 h. Statistical analysis was carried out with ANOVA (significant difference = P < 0.05).

Results

No significant difference was seen in incremental area under the curve (iAUC) plasma-TAG between the meals. ALA and oleic acid levels were significantly increased in plasma after ALA-rich oil and olive oil meals, respectively. Palmitic acid was significantly increased in plasma-TAG after the butter meal. The ratios of 18:2 n-6 to18:3 n-3 in plasma-TAGs, three and seven hours after the ALA-rich oil meal, were 1.5 and 2.4, respectively. The corresponding values after the olive oil meal were: 13.8 and 16.9; and after the butter meal: 9.0 and 11.6.

Conclusions

The postprandial p-TAG and NEFA response in healthy pre-menopausal women was not significantly different after the intake of an ALA-rich oil, olive oil and butter. The ALA-rich oil significantly affected different plasma lipid fractions and improved the ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids several hours postprandially.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.