Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2012Financiación no declarada

The effect of cold water immersion on 48-hour performance testing in collegiate soccer players

Rupp KA, Selkow NM, Parente WR, Ingersoll CD, Weltman AL, Saliba SA

Journal of strength and conditioning research · 24 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2011-10-08 · J Strength Cond Res · vol. 26 · número 8 · págs. 2043–2050
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
42 citas · más que el 84% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
40 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Sports Performance and Training · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention
Palabras clave
cold water immersion, recovery, soccer players, Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test, anaerobic power, countermovement jump, subjective fatigue, volitional fatigue, repeated sprint performance, post-exercise recovery, collegiate athletes, cold water therapy, sex differences in recovery, age differences in recovery
MeSH
humans, exercise test, immersion, muscle fatigue, soccer, adolescent, female, male, athletic performance, young adult

6 autores

  • Kimberly A. Rupp🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Virginia
  • Noelle M. Selkow🇺🇸Illinois State University
  • William R. Parente🇺🇸University of Virginia
  • Christopher D. Ingersoll🇺🇸Central Michigan University
  • ARTHUR L. WELTMAN🇺🇸University of Virginia
  • SUSAN A. SALIBA🇺🇸University of Virginia

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

This randomized, controlled, laboratory study was designed to examine the effect of cold water immersion (CWI) as a recovery modality on repeat performance on the yo-yo intermittent recovery test (YIRT), a widely accepted tool for the evaluation of physical performance in soccer, separated by 48 hours. Twenty-two healthy Division I collegiate soccer players (13 men and 9 women; age, 19.8 ± 1.1 years; height, 174.0 ± 9.0 cm; mass, 72.1 ± 9.1 kg) volunteered as participants during the noncompetitive season. The YIRT was used to induce volitional fatigue and was administered at baseline and again 48 hours later. Athletes progressively increased sprint speed between markers set 20 m apart until pace was failed. Countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) was used to assess anaerobic power and was measured before YIRT, immediately post-YIRT, and 24 and 48 hours post-YIRT. A 10-cm horizontal visual analog scale was administered immediately, 24 hours and 48 hours post-YIRT to assess perceived fatigue (PF) in the legs. Participants were randomly placed into the CWI or control group. The CWI condition consisted of immersion to the umbilicus in a 12°C pool for 15 minutes, whereas the control group sat quietly for 15 minutes. There were no significant differences between intervention conditions on YIRT performance (control, 4,900 ± 884 m; CWI, 5,288 ± 1,000 m; p = 0.35) or PF (control, 9.4 ± 0.5 cm; CWI, 9.3 ± 0.6 cm; p = 0.65) at 48 hours post-YIRT. There was a main time effect for CMVJ over 48 hours, but no group differences (pre-YIRT, 64.6 ± 11.0 cm; post-YIRT, 66.4 ± 10.9 cm; 24 hours post-YIRT, 63.4 ± 9.9 cm; 48 hours post-YIRT, 63.1 ± 9.4 cm; p = 0.02). This study demonstrated that in collegiate soccer players, CWI performed immediately and 24 hours after induced volitional fatigue did not affect subsequent physical performance estimates.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.