Whole grain rye breakfast - sustained satiety during three weeks of regular consumption
Isaksson H, Tillander I, Andersson R, Olsson J, Fredriksson H, Webb DL, Åman P
Physiology & behavior · 41 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Posiblemente financiado por la industria
- Empresa
- Cerealia Foundation R&D
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2011-10-28 · Physiol Behav · vol. 105 · número 3 · págs. 877–884
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 66 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 6.3× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 61 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Food composition and properties · Regulation of Appetite and Obesity · Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Palabras clave
- whole grain rye, satiety, appetite, hunger, desire to eat, orocecal transit time, colonic fermentation, breath hydrogen, breakfast, energy intake
- MeSH
- humans, hydrogen, sulfapyridine, sulfasalazine, analysis of variance, follow-up studies, cross-over studies, double-blind method, hunger, appetite, satiation, fermentation, energy intake, time factors, dietary fiber, adolescent, adult, middle aged, female, male, young adult, oryza
7 autores
- Hanna Isaksson🇸🇪Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
- Isabella Tillander🇸🇪Lantmännen
- Roger Andersson🇸🇪Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
- Johan Olsson
- Helena Fredriksson🇸🇪Lantmännen
- Dominic‐Luc Webb🇸🇪Uppsala University
- Per Åman🇸🇪Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Whole grain rye products have previously been shown to increase feelings of satiety for up to 8h after intake under standardized conditions. This study was set out to investigate the sustainability of the satiating effect after regular consumption of breakfast meals with whole grain rye porridge or refined wheat bread. The study was randomized, cross-over and double-blind. Healthy subjects (n=24) were randomly assigned to daily consumption of iso-caloric standardized breakfast meals with whole grain rye porridge or refined wheat bread for two 3-wk phases, separated by a wash out of 3-4weeks. Each intervention phase had 3 scheduled visit days (days 1, 8 and 22) when appetite ratings (hunger, satiety and desire to eat) were registered for 24h at standardized conditions. Orocecal transit time (salicylazosulfapyridine/sulfapyridine method) and breath hydrogen as an indicator of colonic fermentation were measured at day 8 of each 3-wk phase in a subgroup (n=16). To investigate effects of breakfast on free-living food intake, 3-day weighed food diaries were self-registered during both intervention phases. Whole grain rye porridge breakfast resulted in higher ratings of satiety and lower hunger and desire to eat during 4h post consumption compared to refined wheat bread breakfast (p<0.001). This effect was sustained throughout the 3-wk study phases. Unlike previous studies, the effects did not persist into the afternoon (4-8h). The orocecal transit times after consumption of both breakfasts were similar and in the range of 5-6h. The rye porridge resulted in high levels of breath hydrogen 4-8h after intake, showing extensive colonic fermentation. This was however not related to any changes in appetite during this time-period. There were no significant differences in self-reported macronutrient- and energy intake between diets. This study shows that the satiating effect of rye persists after repeated daily consumption for up to three weeks. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01117363.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.