Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2012Acceso abierto

Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury in sweat: a systematic review

Sears ME, Kerr KJ, Bray RI

Journal of environmental and public health · 55 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Sin resultado de salud

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Gobierno
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2012-01-01 · J Environ Public Health · vol. 2012 · págs. 1–10
Editorial
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Citado
108 citas · más que el 54% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
47 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Restraint-Related Deaths · Vitamin D Research Studies
Palabras clave
SWEAT, Mercury (programming language), Cadmium, Toxicant, Arsenic, Excretion, Urine, Medicine, Physiology, Toxicology, Environmental health, Chemistry, Internal medicine, Toxicity, Biology
MeSH
sweat, humans, arsenic, metals, heavy, cadmium, lead, mercury, environmental pollutants, body burden, environmental exposure, environmental monitoring

3 autores

  • Margaret Sears🇨🇦 · autor de correspondenciaChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Ottawa Hospital; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Kathleen J. Kerr🇨🇦University of Toronto; Women's College Hospital
  • Riina I. Bray🇨🇦University of Toronto; Women's College Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury exposures are ubiquitous. These toxic elements have no physiological benefits, engendering interest in minimizing body burden. The physiological process of sweating has long been regarded as "cleansing" and of low risk. Reports of toxicant levels in sweat were sought in Medline, Embase, Toxline, Biosis, and AMED as well as reference lists and grey literature, from inception to March 22, 2011. Of 122 records identified, 24 were included in evidence synthesis. Populations, and sweat collection methods and concentrations varied widely. In individuals with higher exposure or body burden, sweat generally exceeded plasma or urine concentrations, and dermal could match or surpass urinary daily excretion. Arsenic dermal excretion was severalfold higher in arsenic-exposed individuals than in unexposed controls. Cadmium was more concentrated in sweat than in blood plasma. Sweat lead was associated with high-molecular-weight molecules, and in an interventional study, levels were higher with endurance compared with intensive exercise. Mercury levels normalized with repeated saunas in a case report. Sweating deserves consideration for toxic element detoxification. Research including appropriately sized trials is needed to establish safe, effective therapeutic protocols.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.