Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2013No es en personasFinanciación no declarada

Red and processed meat intake and risk of colorectal adenomas: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Xu X, Yu E, Gao X, Song N, Liu L, Wei X, Zhang W, Fu C

International journal of cancer · 56 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2012-05-03 · Int J Cancer · vol. 132 · número 2 · págs. 437–448
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
72 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 3.5× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
51 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
Red meat, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Confounding, Confidence interval, Colorectal adenoma, Observational study, Internal medicine, Cohort study, Colorectal cancer, Animal science, Cancer, Biology, Pathology
MeSH
animals, cattle, deer, sheep, swine, adenoma, colorectal neoplasms, risk, regression analysis, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, meat products

8 autores

  • Xiaodong Xu🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
  • Enda Yu🇨🇳🇩🇪Second Military Medical University; X-Fab (Germany); Changhai Hospital
  • Xianhua Gao🇨🇳🇩🇪Second Military Medical University; X-Fab (Germany); Changhai Hospital
  • Ning Song🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
  • Lianjie Liu🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
  • Xubiao Wei🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
  • Wei Zhang🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
  • Chuangang Fu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSecond Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Inconsistent results regarding the association between red and processed meat intake and the risk of colorectal adenoma (CRA), the precursor of colorectal cancer (CRC), have been reported. To provide a quantitative assessment of this association, we summarized the evidence from observational studies. Relevant studies were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE until December 31, 2011. Summary relative risks (SRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran's Q and I(2) statistics. A total of 21 studies (16 case-control studies and five cohort/nested case-control studies) were included in this meta-analysis. The SRRs of CRA were 1.36 (95% CI = 1.17-1.58) for every 100 g/day increase in red meat intake, and 1.24 (95% CI = 1.12-1.36) for the highest versus the lowest level of red meat intake. Nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis indicated that CRA risk increased approximately linearly with increasing intake of red meat up to ~ 90 g/day, where the curve reached its plateau. Subgrouped analyses revealed that the increased risk of CRA with intake of red meat was independent of geographic locations, design and confounders. The SRRs of CRA was 1.28 (95% CI = 1.03-1.60) for per 50 g/day increase in processed meat intake, and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.08-1.26) for the highest versus the lowest level of processed meat intake. Increased intake of red and processed meat is associated with significantly increased risk of CRA.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.