Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2012

Daily self-monitoring of body weight, step count, fruit/vegetable intake, and water consumption: a feasible and effective long-term weight loss maintenance approach

Akers JD, Cornett RA, Savla JS, Davy KP, Davy BM

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 39 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK075242); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK075424)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2012-04-25 · J Acad Nutr Diet · vol. 112 · número 5 · págs. 685–692.e2
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
66 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 8.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
54 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior · Physical Activity and Health
Palabras clave
weight loss maintenance, self-monitoring, older adults, step count, fruit and vegetable intake, water consumption, physical activity, dietary behavior, feasibility
MeSH
humans, fruit, vegetables, body weight, weight loss, monitoring, ambulatory, body mass index, combined modality therapy, self care, feasibility studies, health behavior, patient compliance, motor activity, drinking, aged, middle aged, female, male, overweight, secondary prevention

5 autores

  • Jeremy D. Akers🇺🇸Virginia Tech
  • Rachel Ann Cornett🇺🇸University of Virginia
  • Jyoti Tina Savla
  • Kevin P. Davy🇺🇸Virginia Tech
  • Brenda Marie Davy🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaVirginia Tech

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Maintenance of weight loss remains a challenge for most individuals. Thus, practical and effective weight-loss maintenance (WTLM) strategies are needed. A two-group 12-month WTLM intervention trial was conducted from June 2007 to February 2010 to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a WTLM intervention for older adults using daily self-monitoring of body weight, step count, fruit/vegetable (F/V) intake, and water consumption. Forty weight-reduced individuals (mean weight lost=6.7±0.6 kg; body mass index [calculated as kg/m²] 29.2±1.1), age 63±1 years, who had previously participated in a 12-week randomized controlled weight-loss intervention trial, were instructed to record daily body weight, step count, and F/V intake (WEV [defined as weight, exercise, and F/V]). Experimental group (WEV+) participants were also instructed to consume 16 fl oz of water before each main meal (ie, three times daily), and to record daily water intake. Outcome measures included weight change, diet/physical activity behaviors, theoretical constructs related to health behaviors, and other clinical measures. Statistical analyses included growth curve analyses and repeated measures analysis of variance. Over 12 months, there was a linear decrease in weight (β=-0.32, P<0.001) and a quadratic trend (β=0.02, P<0.01) over time, but no group difference (β=-0.23, P=0.08). Analysis of the 365 days of self-reported body weight for each participant determined that weight loss was greater over the study period in the WEV+ group than in the WEV group, corresponding to weight changes of -0.67 kg and 1.00 kg, respectively, and an 87% greater weight loss (β=-0.01, P<0.01). Overall compliance to daily tracking was 76%±5%. Daily self-monitoring of weight, physical activity, and F/V consumption is a feasible and effective approach for maintaining weight loss for 12 months, and daily self-monitoring of increased water consumption may provide additional WTLM benefits.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.