Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2012

Magnesium intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Chen GC, Pang Z, Liu QF

European journal of clinical nutrition · 62 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2012-10-03 · Eur J Clin Nutr · vol. 66 · número 11 · págs. 1182–1186
Editorial
Springer Nature
Citado
83 citas · más que el 54% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Palabras clave
dietary magnesium, colorectal cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, cancer risk, dose-response relationship, calcium intake
MeSH
animals, humans, colorectal neoplasms, colonic neoplasms, rectal neoplasms, magnesium, trace elements, diet, risk, energy intake

3 autores

  • G-C Chen🇨🇳Soochow University
  • Z Pang🇨🇳Suzhou Municipal Hospital
  • Q-F Liu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSoochow University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Epidemiologic studies have suggested that magnesium intake may be associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but the findings have been inconsistent. We aimed to assess this association by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective studies. We performed a literature search on PubMed database through July 2012 to identify prospective studies of magnesium intake in relation to CRC risk. Reference lists of the retrieved articles were also reviewed. A random-effects model was used to compute the summary risk estimates. Eight prospective studies containing 338,979 participants and 8000 CRC cases met the inclusion criteria. The summary relative risk (RR) for the highest vs lowest category of magnesium intake for CRC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-1.00), with little evidence of heterogeneity. Restricting the analysis to six studies that have adjusted for calcium intake yielded a similar result. For colon and rectal cancer, the pooled RR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.72-1.24), respectively. In the dose-response analyses, the summary RRs for an increment of magnesium intake of 50 mg/day for colorectal, colon and rectal cancer were, respectively, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-1.00), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83-1.04), and there was some evidence of heterogeneity; omitting one study that substantially contributed to the heterogeneity yielded generally similar results, but with low heterogeneity. We detected no indication of publication bias. On the basis of the findings of this meta-analysis, a higher magnesium intake seems to be associated with a modest reduction in the risk of CRC, in particular, colon cancer.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.