Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2012Financiación no declarada

Omega 3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Kotwal S, Jun M, Sullivan D, Perkovic V, Neal B

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 144 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2012-10-31 · Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes · vol. 5 · número 6 · págs. 808–818
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
202 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 20.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
38 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Palabras clave
omega-3 fatty acids, cardiovascular outcomes, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular death, cardiac arrhythmias, cerebrovascular events, coronary revascularization, heart failure, end-stage renal disease, gastrointestinal adverse effects, dietary supplements, omega-3 supplementation
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, fatty acids, omega-3, cardiovascular agents, treatment outcome, odds ratio, evidence-based medicine, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, female, male

5 autores

  • Sradha S. Kotwal🇦🇺The University of Sydney; The George Institute for Global Health
  • Min Jun🇦🇺The University of Sydney; The George Institute for Global Health
  • DAVID R. SULLIVAN🇦🇺The University of Sydney; The George Institute for Global Health
  • Vlado Perkovic🇦🇺The University of Sydney; The George Institute for Global Health
  • Bruce Charles Neal🇦🇺The University of Sydney; The George Institute for Global Health

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Early trials evaluating the effect of omega 3 fatty acids (ω-3 FA) reported benefits for mortality and cardiovascular events but recent larger studies trials have variable findings. We assessed the effects of ω-3 FA on cardiovascular and other important clinical outcomes.

Methods and results

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all randomized studies using dietary supplements, dietary interventions, or both. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events (mostly myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes were arrhythmia, cerebrovascular events, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, heart failure, total mortality, nonvascular mortality, and end-stage kidney disease. Twenty studies including 63030 participants were included. There was no overall effect of ω-3 FA on composite cardiovascular events (relative risk [RR]=0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.03; P=0.24) or on total mortality (RR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04; P=0.28). ω-3 FA did protect against vascular death (RR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P=0.03) but not coronary events (RR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.11; P=0.24). There was no effect on arrhythmia (RR=0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.16; P=0.92) or cerebrovascular events (RR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.16; P=0.59). Adverse events were more common in the treatment group than the placebo group (RR=1.18, 95% CI, 1.02-1.37; P=0.03), predominantly because of an excess of gastrointestinal side effects.

Conclusions

ω-3 FA may protect against vascular disease, but the evidence is not clear-cut, and any benefits are almost certainly not as great as previously believed.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.