Biomechanical analysis of surface-athlete impacts on third-generation artificial turf
McGhie D, Ettema G
The American journal of sports medicine · 18 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Solo mecanismosDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio in vitro o de mecanismos (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Solo mecanismos
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2012-11-13 · Am J Sports Med · vol. 41 · número 1 · págs. 177–185
- Editorial
- SAGE Publishing
- Citado
- 43 citas · más que el 83% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 26 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Palabras clave
- Engineering, Environmental science, Forensic engineering
- MeSH
- humans, running, soccer, shoes, adult, male, young adult, biomechanical phenomena
2 autores
- David McGhie🇳🇴 · autor de correspondenciaNorwegian University of Science and Technology
- Gertjan J.C. Ettema🇳🇴Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Excessive repetitive loads are widely believed to be the cause of overload or overuse injuries. On third-generation artificial turf, impacts have been found to vary with surface and shoe properties. Mechanical devices are considered not representative for measuring impact absorption during athletic movements, and pressure insoles have been shown as inaccurate with regard to magnitude of force.
Purpose
To compare impact properties between different third-generation artificial turf systems in combination with various cleat configurations in vivo using force plate technology.
Study design
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods
Twenty-two male soccer players (mean ± SD: age, 23.1 ± 2.8 y; height, 1.81 ± 0.1 m; body mass, 77.5 ± 6.0 kg) performed 10 short sprints, 5 straight with a sudden stop and 5 with a 90° cut, over a force plate covered with artificial turf for each combination of 3 turf systems and 3 cleat configurations.
Results
During stop sprints, peak impact was significantly higher on a recreational-level turf system than professional-level turf systems with and without an underlying shock pad (3.12 body weight [W] vs 3.01 W and 3.02 W, respectively). During cut sprints, peak impact was significantly higher with traditional round cleats than with turf cleats and bladed cleats (2.99 W vs 2.84 W and 2.87 W, respectively).
Conclusion
The results indicate that both an increase in assumed impact-absorbing surface properties and a larger distribution of shorter cleats produced lower impacts during standardized athletic movements. Regardless, none of the shoe-surface combinations yielded peak impacts of an assumed hazardous magnitude.
Clinical relevance
The study provides information on the extent to which various third-generation artificial turf systems and cleat configurations affect impact force, widely believed to be a causative factor for overload and overuse injuries.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.