Red and processed meat intake and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies
Huang W, Han Y, Xu J, Zhu W, Li Z
Cancer causes & control : CCC · 31 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2012-11-21 · Cancer Causes Control · vol. 24 · número 1 · págs. 193–201
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 46 citas · más que el 61% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 42 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Palabras clave
- esophageal adenocarcinoma, red meat, processed meat, dietary intake, cancer risk, dose-response relationship, case-control study, cohort studies
- MeSH
- humans, adenocarcinoma, esophageal neoplasms, diet surveys, risk factors, case-control studies, cohort studies, age factors, eating, observation, food handling, meat, meat products, female, male
5 autores
- Wen Huang🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
- Yujing Han🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- Jiping Xu🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
- Wei Jian Zhu🇨🇳Second Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
- Zhaoshen Li🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSecond Military Medical University; Changhai Hospital
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Aims
Inconsistent results relating dietary red and processed meat intake and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) have been reported. This article summarizes and quantifies the current evidence in a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Methods
Electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to identify peer-reviewed manuscripts up to 31 May 2012. Random-effects models were used to pool study results.
Results
Ten manuscripts from 3 cohort studies and 7 case-control studies were identified. The summary relative risks (SRRs) of EAC for highest versus lowest intake categories were 1.31 (95 % confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.05-1.64) for red meat consumption, and 1.41 (95 % CIs 1.09-1.83) for processed meat consumption. Subgroup analyses indicated that these positive relations were seen in case-control studies, but not in cohort studies. Based on dose-response analysis, similar results were found; the SRRs were 1.45(95 % CIs 1.09-1.93) per 100 g/day of red meat intake and 1.37 (95 % CIs 1.03-1.81) per 50 g/day of processed meat intake.
Conclusions
The results of this meta-analysis indicate that consumption of red and processed meat may be associated with increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. More studies, particularly prospective studies, are needed.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.