Amateur football pitches: mechanical properties of the natural ground and of different artificial turf infills and their biomechanical implications
Zanetti EM, Bignardi C, Franceschini G, Audenino AL
Journal of sports sciences · 16 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio in vitro o de mecanismos (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2012-12-12 · J Sports Sci · vol. 31 · número 7 · págs. 767–778
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 52 citas · más que el 74% de estudios similares · 1.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 37 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports injuries and prevention · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Palabras clave
- Amateur, Football, Natural (archaeology), Aeronautics, Alpine skiing, Engineering, Ecology, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Biology, Medicine, Geography
- MeSH
- humans, athletic injuries, butadienes, styrene, rubber, plastics, soil, task performance and analysis, running, surface properties, friction, acceleration, football, soccer, shoes, adult, athletic performance, young adult, biomechanical phenomena
4 autores
- Elisabetta Maria Zanetti🇮🇹 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Perugia
- Cristina Bignardi🇮🇹Politecnico di Torino
- Giordano Franceschini🇮🇹University of Perugia
- Alberto Luigi Audenino🇮🇹Politecnico di Torino
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Artificial turf is being used more and more often. It is more available than natural turf for use, requires much less maintenance and new products are able to comply with sport performance and athletes' safety. The purpose of this paper is to compare the mechanical and biomechanical responses of two different artificial turf infills (styrene butadiene rubber, from granulated vehicle tires, and thermoplastic rubber granules) and to compare them to the performance of natural fields where amateurs play (beaten earth, substantially). Three mechanical parameters have been calculated from laboratory tests: energy storage, energy losses and surface traction coefficient; results have been correlated with peak accelerations recorded on an instrumented athlete, on the field. The natural ground proved to be stiffer (-15% penetration depth for a given load), and to have a lower dynamic traction coefficient (-48%); the different kinds of infill showed significantly different stiffnesses (varying by more than 23%) and damping behaviour (varying by more than 31%). In running, peak vertical accelerations were lowest in the artificial ground with thermoplastic rubber granules, while, in slalom, both artificial grounds produced higher horizontal peak accelerations compared to the natural ground. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for athletic performance and injury risk.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.