Effects of playing surface on physiological responses and performance variables in a controlled football simulation
Hughes MG, Birdsey L, Meyers R, Newcombe D, Oliver JL, Smith PM, Stembridge M, Stone K, Kerwin DG
Journal of sports sciences · 24 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2013-01-15 · J Sports Sci · vol. 31 · número 8 · págs. 878–886
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 53 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.7× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 49 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
- Palabras clave
- Football, Psychology, Simulation, Computer science, Geography
- MeSH
- humans, fatigue, lactic acid, competitive behavior, heart rate, physical endurance, movement, running, surface properties, football, soccer, adult, athletic performance, young adult
9 autores
- Michael G. Hughes🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaCardiff Metropolitan University
- Laurence P. Birdsey🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
- R. Meyers🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
- Daniel J. Newcombe🇬🇧Oxford Brookes University
- Jon L. Oliver🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
- Paul M. Smith🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
- Michael Stembridge🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
- Keeron J. Stone🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
- David George Kerwin🇬🇧Cardiff Metropolitan University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
In spite of the increased acceptance of artificial turf in football, few studies have investigated if matches are altered by the type of surface used and no research has compared physiological responses to football activity on artificial and natural surfaces. In the present study, participants performed a football match simulation on high-quality artificial and natural surfaces. Neither mean heart rate (171 ± 9 beats · min(-1) vs. 171 ± 9 beats · min(-1); P > 0.05) nor blood lactate (4.8 ± 1.6 mM vs. 5.3 ± 1.8 mM; P > 0.05) differed between the artificial and natural surface, respectively. Measures of sprint, jumping and agility performance declined through the match simulation but surface type did not affect the decrease in performance. For example, the fatigue index of repeated sprints did not differ (P > 0.05) between the artificial, (6.9 ± 2.1%) and natural surface (7.4 ± 2.4%). The ability to turn after sprinting was affected by surface type but this difference was dependent on the type of turn. Although there were small differences in the ability to perform certain movements between artificial and natural surfaces, the results suggest that fatigue and physiological responses to football activity do not differ markedly between surface-type using the high-quality pitches of the present study.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.