Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2013

Proportion of neural tube defects attributable to known risk factors

Agopian AJ, Tinker SC, Lupo PJ, Canfield MA, Mitchell LE, National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 80 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de casos y controles (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Gobierno
Intramural CDC HHS
Gobierno
NCBDD CDC HHS
Subvenciones
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01DD000494); National Institutes of Health (CC999999)

Según 4 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2012-11-27 · Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol · vol. 97 · número 1 · págs. 42–46
Citado
129 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 4.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
17 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Folate and B Vitamins Research · Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations · Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Palabras clave
Anencephaly, Attributable risk, Medicine, Spina bifida, Population, Neural tube, Obesity, Risk factor, Pregnancy, Offspring, Ethnic group, Neural tube defect, Pediatrics, Environmental health, Obstetrics, Internal medicine, Fetus, Genetics, Biology
MeSH
humans, anencephaly, spinal dysraphism, pregnancy complications, obesity, risk assessment, risk factors, mothers, maternal exposure, causality, pregnancy, databases, factual, adult, united states, female, male, hispanic or latino

6 autores

  • A. J. Agopian🇺🇸Center for Human Genetics; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Sarah C. Tinker🇺🇸Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
  • Philip J. Lupo🇺🇸The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Mark A. Canfield🇺🇸Texas Department of State Health Services
  • Laura E. Mitchell🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • and the National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Recognized risk factors for neural tube defects (NTDs) poorly predict population-level NTD risk. However, the proportion of NTDs that can be attributed to these risk factors is uncertain.

Methods

To determine the proportion of NTD cases that is attributable to known or suspected risk factors (i.e., female infant sex, family history of NTDs, and maternal Hispanic ethnicity, obesity, pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, low dietary folate intake, lack of folic acid supplementation, anticonvulsant use, and hot tub or sauna use), we estimated the adjusted population attributable fraction (aAF) for each factor, using the method of Eide and Geffler and data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Results

Our analyses of these data indicate that the proportion of cases of spina bifida and anencephaly that can be attributed to known risk factors is 28% and 44%, respectively. For spina bifida, the factor with the greatest attributable fraction was maternal obesity (aAF, 10%), whereas for anencephaly it was Hispanic ethnicity (aAF, 15%).

Conclusion

Our analyses indicate that known risk factors account for <50% of NTD cases. Hence, the majority of NTD cases are attributable to, as yet, unidentified factors. These findings highlight the need for continued research to identify genetic and additional nongenetic risk factors for NTDs. Further, these findings suggest that strategies that aim to reduce the risk of NTDs associated with maternal Hispanic ethnicity and obesity may have the greatest impact on the population prevalence of these conditions.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.