Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2013Financiado por la industriaAcceso abierto

Financiado en parte por Danone

Circadian variation and responsiveness of hydration biomarkers to changes in daily water intake

Perrier E, Demazières A, Girard N, Pross N, Osbild D, Metzger D, Guelinckx I, Klein A

European journal of applied physiology · 113 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Empresa
Danone

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2013-04-21 · Eur J Appl Physiol · vol. 113 · número 8 · págs. 2143–2151
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
141 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 5.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
27 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Dietary Effects on Health
Palabras clave
Circadian rhythm, Human physiology, Variation (astronomy), Sports medicine, Chronobiology, Physiology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Biology, Endocrinology, Physical therapy
MeSH
saliva, plasma, urine, humans, dehydration, case-control studies, prospective studies, cross-over studies, water-electrolyte balance, circadian rhythm, drinking, osmolar concentration, adult, female, male, biomarkers

8 autores

  • Erica T. Perrier🇫🇷 · autor de correspondenciaDanone (France)
  • A. Demazières🇫🇷Centre hospitalier de Rouffach
  • Nicolas Girard🇫🇷Centre hospitalier de Rouffach
  • Nathalie Pross🇫🇷Centre hospitalier de Rouffach
  • Dominique Osbild🇫🇷Centre hospitalier de Rouffach
  • DEBORAH A. METZGER🇫🇷Centre hospitalier de Rouffach
  • Isabelle Guelinckx🇫🇷Danone (France)
  • Alexis Klein🇫🇷Danone (France)

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Biomarkers of hydration change in response to acute dehydration; however, their responsiveness to changes in fluid intake volume, without exercise or heat exposure, has not been adequately described. Moreover, patterns of circadian variation in hydration biomarkers have not been established. The study aims were to (1) assess the response of hydration biomarkers to changes in daily water intake; and (2) evaluate circadian variation in urinary and salivary biomarkers. Fifty-two adults (24.8 ± 3.1 years; 22.3 ± 1.6 kg/m(2); 79 % female), grouped based on habitual fluid intake (low drinkers, n = 30, 2.0 L/day), completed a 5-day inpatient crossover trial. On days 1 and 2, low drinkers received 1.0 L/day of water while high drinkers received 2.5 L/day. On days 3 through 5, intake was reversed between groups. Plasma and saliva osmolality were assessed daily at predetermined times, and all urine produced over 24 h was collected in timed intervals. ANOVA with intake (1.0 vs. 2.5 L/day), day, and time revealed that (1) urine concentration (osmolality, specific gravity, color) and volume, but not plasma nor saliva osmolality, responded to changes in water intake; (2) urinary hydration biomarkers and saliva osmolality vary as a function of the time of day; and (3) urine osmolality measured in samples collected during the afternoon most closely reflects the corresponding 24 h value. Overall, urinary hydration biomarkers are responsive to changes in water intake, and stabilize within 24 h of modifying intake volume. Moreover, short afternoon urine collections may be able to replace 24 h collections for more convenience in hydration assessment.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.